Re: site.

2006-02-10 Thread John McFarlane
I would he happy to help out if my experience would be useful. http://thinkflat.com/home/portfolio/ Lemme know if there's anything I can do :) John M. __ Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Daniel J. Popowich wrote: > >> Could we run

Re: site.

2006-02-12 Thread John McFarlane
I don't at all mean to sound confrontational, but would simple xml + xsl be a bit easier to implement? If we're just going to have a few pages, a simple shell script could loop thru them calling xsltproc. Then again, I'm a fan of using simple tools for simple needs? Here's an example of document

Re: site.

2006-02-12 Thread John McFarlane
Yes, I was thinking in fact to use the same xml structure/schema :) Let me mock up something tomorrow which might provide a better feel for how an alternate approach might feel... I'll use the same xml files. I'll report back :) John M. Jim Gallacher wro

Re: mod_python 3.2.5b available for testing

2005-11-14 Thread John McFarlane
Not sure if this is helpfull, but here goes... To run test.py I did the following: Overlay: http://thinkflat.com/files/public/?d=/ebuilds/mod_python user# sudo emerge -a mod_python user# tar zxvf mod_python-3.2.5b.tgz user# cd mod_python-3.2.5b user# ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs2 user#

Re: mod_python 3.2.5b available for testing

2005-11-15 Thread John McFarlane
Sure enough /tmp/mp_sess.dbm was present, and owned by apache. I removed the file and tested again with the same results. In doing so /tmp/mp_sess.dbm was re-created and owned by the user running the test. John M. Jim Gallacher wrote: > John McFarlane wrote: >>

Re: mod_python 3.2.6b available for testing

2006-01-15 Thread John McFarlane
+1 Gentoo [current], Apache-2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python-2.4, gcc-3.4.4 Jim Gallacher wrote: > A new mod_python 3.2.6 beta tarball is now available for testing. > Nicolas has built windows versions for Python 2.4 and Python 2.3 which > should also be available at www.modpython.org/dist shortly. >