Re: sys.path and htaccess change?

2007-05-18 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
Jorey Bump writes: Graham Dumpleton wrote: The whole point of the changes which were made was to draw a well defined line between the code modules used in the web application and which reside in the document tree, or other specially specified areas by way of mod_python module importer

sys.path and htaccess change?

2007-05-17 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
In mod_python 3.2.x, if I set a directory to use mod_python with a .htaccess file, I will find that directory in sys.path. That is, if: /var/www/somedir/.htaccess contains: SetHandler python-program then sys.path will have /var/www/somedir as element zero. With 3.3.x this does not

sys.path and htaccess change?

2007-05-17 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
In mod_python 3.2.x, if I set a directory to use mod_python with a .htaccess file, I will find that directory in sys.path. That is, if: /var/www/somedir/.htaccess contains: SetHandler python-program then sys.path will have /var/www/somedir as element zero. With 3.3.x this does not

Re: sys.path and htaccess change?

2007-05-17 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
Graham Dumpleton writes: Read: http://www.modpython.org/live/current/doc-html/pyapi-apmeth.html Especially the area which starts just before: PythonOption mod_python.importer.path ['~'] Your particular issue is mentioned just after this example. Doesn't work, either in .htaccess

Python 2.x; what's x?

2006-02-16 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
Graham Dumpleton (JIRA) writes: If mod_python is to still support Python 2.2, which it looks like we are still because of Nokia work, then can't use the Python bool type yet as that was only added to Python 2.3. But can't a decision be made? I think deciding by not deciding is less than an

Re: [DRAFT] ANNOUNCE: Mod_python 3.2.7

2006-02-10 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy writes: On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: Depending on Grisha's preference, I think we should either put the content in svn and have a cron job on modpython.org do a nightly update, or start using the Apache infrastructure for the website. See

Re: 3.2.6 or not

2006-02-03 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
Jim Gallacher writes: Graham Dumpleton wrote: To confirm Jim's arithmetic anyway, I say -1 on 3.2.6 as it stands. As to 3.2.7, I say +1, subject to removal of problematic test case as already raised and with us at least confirming tests run OK for version out of SVN prior to

Re: Python 2.2 support

2006-02-02 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
Jim Gallacher writes: Daniel J. Popowich wrote: Regardless, I do not think it is within the scope of mod_python developers to keep users forward-compatible with the underlying python version. Sorry, but IMHO, this is not scalable software engineering. I'll re-read this paragraph after

Re: Python 2.2 support

2006-02-01 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
Nicolas Lehuen writes: I've just checked in some changes to the Python source code in order to support Python 2.2. Now the test suite runs successfully on Python 2.2.3 on Windows 2000. I've checked that no regressions were introduced in later Python versions, too. The changes are pretty

Re: Various musings about the request URL / URI / whatever

2005-11-30 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy writes: I think a properly designed site should insist on its host name, i.e. I see you think I'm gobbledygook.bleh, but I'm going to redirect you to http://www.modpython.org/ because that is my true name. This is very common with sites that respond to both

Re: Various musings about the request URL / URI / whatever

2005-11-29 Thread Daniel J. Popowich
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy writes: On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: If I understand you correctly, req.hostname is not reliable in case where virtual hosting is not used. What about server.server_hostname, which seems to be used by the code from mod_rewrite you posted below ?