Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Hmm, that got me to thinking a bit more. Here's another subjective two
> cents worth. "exit" seems to be a more global concept and "leave" seems
> more local. For instance, I leave a room but exit a building. In
> Python, sys.exit and os._exit are grand exits rather
On Friday 01 July 2005 10:45 am, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 01 July 2005 11:44, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > Resource managers.
>
> Yeah, I was thinking that, but was somewhat ambivalent. But I definately
> like it better than anything else proposed so far.
I like that as well. My hat i
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005, Facundo Batista wrote:
> On 7/1/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> * Time value of money computations are typically dimensionless (not
>> sensitive to currency type or formatting) and they often have algorithm
>> specific rounding needs (round at the end o
Aahz wrote:
> This is off-topic for python-dev. Please take it to comp.lang.python.
> (It's not immediately obvious that this is off-topic, I know, but please
> take my word for it.)
Done:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-July/288292.html
Sorry for creating so much noise he
On 7/1/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Facundo]
> > The pre-PEP is almost done, and the corresponding
> > test cases are all written.
>
> What is the part about the pre-PEP? Something like this probably
> shouldn't go in the standard library until it has been proven in the
>
"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'd also be happy with
>
> def __init__(self, self.x, self.y, self.z):
>
> which wouldn't be too different from unpacking tuples
If you are willing to require that the args be passed as a tuple (ext
"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josiah Carlson wrote:
> > Now, don't get me wrong, definining __slots__ can be a pain in the
> > tookus, but with a proper metaclass, that metaclass can define the
> > __slots__ attribute based on the argument list for __init__().
> >
> > Th
Nick Coghlan wrote:
[...]
> If the right hand side of 'as' permitted the same forms as are going
> to be permitted for the 'as' clause in 'with' statements, then Ralf's
> situation could be handled via:
>
>def __init__(self as s, x as s.x, y as s.y, z as s.z):
> pass
>
> Essentially
