At 05:49 AM 7/5/2006 +0200, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>* Alternate spelling of outer names when binding (e.g. ".x = whatever" to
>>bind an outer x)
>
>We looked at and rejected "globals.x = whatever". I think the same
>reasoning applies here.
I thought the 'globals.x' proposal required that 'x' alw
On Jul 4, 2006, at 11:21 PM, Neal Norwitz wrote:
Ronald, Bob,
I know Skip found and fixed his problem, however, is this problem
likely to affect other users? Is there anything we can do to help
alleviate/diagnose this problem?
I'll either enhance configure or roll back my change to setup.py
Aahz wrote:
> Ah-ha! I haven't actually tested this directly, but I bet I know what's
> going on: this isn't properly quoted and fails with TARGETDIR of
> "C:\Program Files\Python25" because of the space. I did test to see that
> it works fine with "C:\Python25"
>
> Shall I file a bug? Or do yo
On 7/5/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:18 AM 7/5/2006 +0200, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >I don't see anything else that's attractive. The realistic options are:
> >
> >1. do nothing
> >2. extend global's meaning
> >3. add outer keyword
>
> Did you also consider and reject:
>
>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
> Aahz wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone else tried doing an admin install with "compile .py files"
>> checked? It's causing my install to blow up, but I'd prefer to assume
>> it's some weird Windows config/bug unless other people also have it, in
>> which case
On 7/4/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From actual users of
> the language I get more complaints about the breakneck speed of
> Python's evolution than about the brokenness of the current language.
Guido,
I'm really interested in your perspective here. I assume you hear far
At 12:18 AM 7/5/2006 +0200, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>I don't see anything else that's attractive. The realistic options are:
>
>1. do nothing
>2. extend global's meaning
>3. add outer keyword
Did you also consider and reject:
* Alternate binding operators (e.g. ":=", ".=", etc.)
* Alternate spel
On 7/4/06, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Also please explain what problem you are solving before proposing a
> > solution.
> Actually, the "problem" I am trying to solve is the debate on the
> mailing list. That is, I listen to what people are asking for, and what
On 7/4/06, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/7/3, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > To fake things like this, socket.setdefaulttimeout() was added, though
> > I don't know if it actually works. Have you tried that?
>
> This affect all the sockets.
So, assuming your app is
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Please move this to the python-3000 list.
>
> Also please explain what problem you are solving before proposing a
> solution.
>
> I note that we are seeing quite a flurry of language change proposals.
> I have to recommend restraint; I *don't* want to turn the entire
>
Ronald, Bob,
I know Skip found and fixed his problem, however, is this problem
likely to affect other users? Is there anything we can do to help
alleviate/diagnose this problem?
n
--
On 7/1/06, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2006, at 8:46 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>
>
Thomas Heller wrote:
> I would like to ask about the possibility to add some improvements to
> ctypes
> in Python 2.5, although the feature freeze is now in effect. Hopefully
> former third-party libraries can have the freeze relaxed somewhat;-).
>
> I intend to do these changes, the first is a
2006/7/3, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> To fake things like this, socket.setdefaulttimeout() was added, though
> I don't know if it actually works. Have you tried that?
This affect all the sockets. And I hit the problem when servicing
information with a web service (TCPServer), and I ne
Please move this to the python-3000 list.
Also please explain what problem you are solving before proposing a solution.
I note that we are seeing quite a flurry of language change proposals.
I have to recommend restraint; I *don't* want to turn the entire
language upside down. That's not a commen
> Borrowing from Perl, the keyword 'my' is used to declare an explicitly
> scoped variable:
>
> def f1():
>my x = 1
>def f2():
> x = 2 # Does not create a new x
>
> In the above example, the statement 'my x = 1' declares that the scope
> of the variable 'x' is the
Talin wrote:
> This is sort of a re-do of an earlier proposal which seems to have
> gotten lost in the shuffle of the larger debate.
>
> I propose to create a new type of scoping rule, which I will call
> "explicit" lexical scoping, that will co-exist with the current
> "implicit" scoping rule tha
I've got a couple of changes ready to go for beta 2, but need a go ahead from
one of the release managers before committing either of them:
1. Finishing the __module_name__ workaround to allow relative imports from the
main module when using -m.
I'd really like to finish this, because having
Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> I'm glad to see Anthony ratcheting down. At this point, we need to be
> fixing bugs and improving doc. Maybe Anthony and I should have a
> contest to see who can revert the most changes. :-)
>
Neal (and/or Anthony),
I would like to ask about the possibility to add some i
Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
>Hi Brett,
>
>Here are some comments on the description of the restricted execution
>model that you posted.
>
> [snip...]
>
>>Filesystem
>>===
>>
>>The most obvious facet of a filesystem to protect is reading from it.
>>One does not want what is stored in ``/etc/
Hi Brett,
Here are some comments on the description of the restricted execution
model that you posted.
> When referring to the state of an interpreter, it is either "trusted" or
> "untrusted". A trusted interpreter has no restrictions imposed upon any
> resource. An untrusted interpreter has at
This is sort of a re-do of an earlier proposal which seems to have
gotten lost in the shuffle of the larger debate.
I propose to create a new type of scoping rule, which I will call
"explicit" lexical scoping, that will co-exist with the current
"implicit" scoping rule that exists in Python tod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Facundo> I need a timeout in urlopen, just to be able to make:
>
> urllib2.urlopen("http://no.host.org";, timeout=2)
>
> Facundo> This is actually not possible, but I'll make it work.
>
> Facundo> I want to know, please, if this is useful in genera
22 matches
Mail list logo
