On 9/16/06, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lawrence Oluyede wrote:>> That was my first thought as well. Unfortunately a quick test shows>> that class Foo(): creates an old style class instead :(>> I think that's because until it'll be safe to break things we will
> stick with classic by defaul
Talin wrote:
> Is the result a new-style or classic-style class? It would be nice if
> using the empty parens forced a new-style class...
No, it wouldn't, IMO. Too subtle a clue.
Best to just wait for Py3k when all classes will
be new-style.
--
Greg
_
Lawrence Oluyede wrote:
>> That was my first thought as well. Unfortunately a quick test shows
>> that class Foo(): creates an old style class instead :(
>
> I think that's because until it'll be safe to break things we will
> stick with classic by default...
But in this case nothing will be b
> That was my first thought as well. Unfortunately a quick test shows
> that class Foo(): creates an old style class instead :(
I think that's because until it'll be safe to break things we will
stick with classic by default...
--
Lawrence
http://www.oluyede.org/blog
_
On 9/16/06, Lawrence Oluyede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that this change should be presented at
> > http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/whatsnew25.html
>
> It's already listed there: http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/other-lang.html
>
Thanks... also, I don't know if the empty yield s
On 9/16/06, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > As for the reason: it makes it possible to use the same style for classes
> > without bases as is used for functions without arguments. Prior to this
> > change, there was a sharp break in the class syntax, such that if you got
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> As for the reason: it makes it possible to use the same style for classes
> without bases as is used for functions without arguments. Prior to this
> change, there was a sharp break in the class syntax, such that if you got rid
> of the last base class you had to get rid of
[Martin v. Löwis]
> ...
> Can somebody remember what the reason is to invoke cmd.exe (or COMSPEC)
> in os.popen?
Absolutely necessary, as any number of shell gimmicks can be used in
the passed string, same as on non-Windows boxes; .e.g.,
>>> import os
>>> os.environ['STR'] = 'SSL'
>>> p = os.pope
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> The test suite currently (2.5) has two failures on Windows
> if Python is installed into a directory with a space in it
> (such as "Program Files"). The failing tests are test_popen
> and test_cmd_line.
>
> The test_cmd_line failure is shallow: the test fails to properly
>
On 9/13/06, Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CPython 2.5, which will be released Real Soon Now, is the firstversion to ship with new "AST branch", which have been in developmentfor a long time.AST branch uses ASDL, Abstract Syntax Description Language
http://asdl.sourceforge.net/ to describ
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:22:34 +0200, "\"Martin v. Löwis\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The test suite currently (2.5) has two failures on Windows
>if Python is installed into a directory with a space in it
>(such as "Program Files"). The failing tests are test_popen
>and test_cmd_line.
>
>The test_
Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
> I've been porting the grammar for pydev to version 2.5 and I've seen
> that you can now declare a class in the format: class B():pass
> (without the testlist)
>
> -- from the grammar: classdef: 'class' NAME ['(' [testlist] ')'] ':' suite
>
> I think that this change should
The test suite currently (2.5) has two failures on Windows
if Python is installed into a directory with a space in it
(such as "Program Files"). The failing tests are test_popen
and test_cmd_line.
The test_cmd_line failure is shallow: the test fails to properly
quote sys.executable when passing it
> I think that this change should be presented at
> http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/whatsnew25.html
It's already listed there: http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/other-lang.html
--
Lawrence
http://www.oluyede.org/blog
___
Python-Dev mailing list
I've been porting the grammar for pydev to version 2.5 and I've seen
that you can now declare a class in the format: class B():pass
(without the testlist)
-- from the grammar: classdef: 'class' NAME ['(' [testlist] ')'] ':' suite
I think that this change should be presented at
http://docs.python.
Hi all,
There are more cases of signed integer overflows in the CPython source
code base...
That's on a 64-bits machine:
[GCC 4.1.2 20060715 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-9)] on linux2
abs(-sys.maxint-1) == -sys.maxint-1
I'd expect the same breakage everywhere when GCC 4.2 is used. Note t
16 matches
Mail list logo
