-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 7:10 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Well, you can always use setuptools, which generates script
> wrappers that import the desired module and call a function, after
> first setting up sys.path. :)
That's so 21st Century! Where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 01:05 PM 11/28/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > There's a related issue that may or may not be in scope for this
>> > thread. For
At 06:41 PM 11/28/2006 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>At 01:05 PM 11/28/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>>On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > There's a related issue that may or may not be in scope for this
>>> > thread.
On 11:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I keep thinking I'd like to treat the OS as just another application,
>so that there's nothing special about it and the same infrastructure
>could be used for other applications with lots of entry level scripts.
I agree. The motivation here is that the "OS"
> I question whether a distro built on Python can even afford to allow
> 3rd party packages to be installed in their system's site-packages.
> Maybe Python needs to extend its system-centric view of site-packages
> with an application-centric and/or user-centric view of extensions?
Agree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:05 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There's a related issue that may or may not be in scope for this
>> thread. For distros like Gentoo or Ubuntu that rely heavily on their
>>
At 01:05 PM 11/28/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's a related issue that may or may not be in scope for this
> > thread. For distros like Gentoo or Ubuntu that rely heavily on their
> > own system Python for the OS to work properl
On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a related issue that may or may not be in scope for this
> thread. For distros like Gentoo or Ubuntu that rely heavily on their
> own system Python for the OS to work properly, I'm quite loathe to
> install Cheeseshop packages into the
Ronald Oussoren schrieb:
>
> On Friday, November 24, 2006, at 08:21PM, "Thomas Heller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>I'd like to ask for help with an issue which I do not know
>>how to solve.
>>
>>Please see this bug http://python.org/sf/1563807
>>"ctypes built with GCC on AIX 5.3 fails with ld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
> On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For distros like Gentoo or Ubuntu that rely heavily on their
>> own system Python for the OS to work properly, I'm quite loathe to
>> install Cheese
On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For distros like Gentoo or Ubuntu that rely heavily on their
> own system Python for the OS to work properly, I'm quite loathe to
> install Cheeseshop packages into the system site-packages. I've had
> Gentoo break occasionally when I did this
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Talin schrieb:
>> To that extent, it can be useful sometimes to have someone who is in the
>> process of learning how to use the system, and who is willing to
>> carefully analyze and write down their own experiences while doing so.
>
> I readily agree that the document
Robin Bryce schrieb:
> python2.4 profile (pstats) etc, was removed due to licensing issues
> rather than FHS. Should not be an issue for python2.5 but what, in
> general, can a vendor do except break python if their licensing policy
> cant accommodate all of pythons batteries ?
If some vendor has
Talin schrieb:
> To that extent, it can be useful sometimes to have someone who is in the
> process of learning how to use the system, and who is willing to
> carefully analyze and write down their own experiences while doing so.
I readily agree that the documentation can be improved, and appla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> (The only other packaging thing like this that I'm aware of is
> python-minimal in Ubuntu. This is done for installation purposes
> and wacky dependency issues that occur when a fair chunk of the O/
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 23:19, Robin Bryce wrote:
> python2.4 profile (pstats) etc, was removed due to licensing
> issues rather than FHS. Should not be an issue for python2.5 but
> what, in general, can a vendor do except break python if their
> licensing policy cant accommodate all of pythons
> Actually, I meant that (among other things) it should be clarified that
> it's alright to e.g. put .pyc and data files inside Python library
> directories, and NOT okay to split them up.
Phillip, Just to be clear: I understand you are not in favour of
re-packaging data from python projects (proj
17 matches
Mail list logo
