On 2/24/08, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let's only do it for -O; the optimization may interfere with debugging the
> code.
Does anyone ever actually bother to use -O?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Short description (see http://
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PRO
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:52 PM, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday's bug day was another success, closing 48 issues. Several
> committers were there: Facundo Bastista, Georg Brandl, and Christian
> Heimes. Facundo organized a local group of participants, and we
> committed a
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I do think map() and filter() should issue a
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I do think map() and filter() should issue a warning under -3 when the
> > first arg is None. (Or does 2to3 detect this now?)
>
> Wha
Let's only do it for -O; the optimization may interfere with debugging the code.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Short description (see http://bugs.python.org/issue2181 for the patch
> and more details):
>
> Optimize code like:
>x = any_expression
>
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Short description (see http://bugs.python.org/issue2181 for the patch
> and more details):
>
> Optimize code like:
>x = any_expression
>return x
>
> to:
>return any_expression
>
> The local variable x is no l
Yesterday's bug day was another success, closing 48 issues. Several
committers were there: Facundo Bastista, Georg Brandl, and Christian
Heimes. Facundo organized a local group of participants, and we
committed a number of contributions from new people.
Should we have one next month? The PyCon
"Nick Coghlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Martin v. Löwis wrote:
|> One issue to consider is also politeness. People sometimes complain that
|> they feel treated unfair if their report is declared "invalid" - they
|> surely believed it was a valid report, at the
Short description (see http://bugs.python.org/issue2181 for the patch
and more details):
Optimize code like:
x = any_expression
return x
to:
return any_expression
The local variable x is no longer set before returning. Is this
appropriate for .pyc generation or should it only be done f
Michael> The downloads page on python.org shows 2.5.1 as the latest
Michael> release:
Michael> http://python.org/download/
Thanks. I just checked in a change. I'm not sure how long it takes to
update the website, but it should be fairly soon.
Skip
_
Hello all,
The downloads page on python.org shows 2.5.1 as the latest release:
http://python.org/download/
Michael
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven:
> -On [20080224 19:57], "Martin v. Lwis" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >I can continue to provide Windows binaries if desired.
>
> If need be, I can help testing the build infrastructure since I have
> access
> to various releases of
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if you're done with this already, but there's a lot of
> experience suggesting such sweeps are quite dangerous. In the past,
> whenever a sweep across the entire stdlib was done, it's always caused
> a fe
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think a -3 warning for oct or hex would do any good.
>
> I do think map() and filter() should issue a warning under -3 when the
> first arg is None. (Or does 2to3 detect this now?)
2to3 does detect that: it wi
-On [20080224 19:57], "Martin v. Löwis" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I can continue to provide Windows binaries if desired.
If need be, I can help testing the build infrastructure since I have access
to various releases of Visual Studio as well.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven /
> It very well might. See Christian Heimes's follow up re: Windows
> builds. OTOH, I'm okay if at least for the alphas, the binary builds
> lag behind the source releases, though I'd like to get the process as
> streamlined as possible.
I can continue to provide Windows binaries if desired
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 22, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've volunteered to be the release manager for Python 2.6 and 3.0.
>> It's been several years since I've RM'd a Python release, and I'm
>> happy to do it again (he says while the m
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> There is some discussion on this subject, archived here:
> >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.gener
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is some discussion on this subject, archived here:
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.general/560661
>>
>> I wonder if anyone could shed some light on this subject?
>>
>> (Or,
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I'd also like for us to consider doing regular monthly releases.
> Several other FLOSS projects I'm involved with are doing this to very
> good success. The nice thing is that everyone knows well in advance
> when the next release is going to happen, and so all developers and
Ron Adam wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>
>>> One issue to consider is also politeness. People sometimes complain that
>>> they feel treated unfair if their report is declared "invalid" - they
>>> surely believed it was a valid report, at the time they made it.
>>
Steve Holden wrote:
> +1 for "cannot reproduce".
"cannot reproduce" is ambiguous in a slightly different, more family
oriented manner ... :]
Christian
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> > Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> >> One issue to consider is also politeness. People sometimes complain that
>> >> they feel treated unfair if their report is declared "invalid" -
24 matches
Mail list logo
