Guido van Rossum wrote:
This sounds more like something to bring up in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, rather than being vague about the
motivation ("would be very interesting", you ought to think of a
realistic use case. For example, are there existing encodings of
binary data using base-96? I'm not awa
This sounds more like something to bring up in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, rather than being vague about the
motivation ("would be very interesting", you ought to think of a
realistic use case. For example, are there existing encodings of
binary data using base-96? I'm not aware of any.
On Fri, Aug 1,
I think that would be very interesting thay Python would have a module
for working on base 96 too. [1]
It could be converted to base 96 the digests from hashlib module, and
random bytes used on crypto (to create the salt, the IV, or a key).
As you can see here [2], the printable ASCII characters
Terry Reedy wrote:
That said, I am curious what working scientists using Python think.
Well, we'll let you know more after SciPy '08, but I suspect the answer is that
they just want one teensy little wafer-thin operator to do matrix multiplication
on numpy arrays or their favorite matrix obj
Fernando Perez wrote:
re
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0225/
I am hereby volunteering to try to organize a BOF session at the conference on
this topic, and can come back later with the summary. I'm also scheduled to
give a talk at BayPiggies on Numpy/Scipy soon after the conference, so
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Sebastien Loisel wrote:
>>
>>> What are the odds of this thing going in?
>>
>> I don't know. Guido has said nothing about it so far this
>> time round, and his is the only opinion that matters in
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:41 AM, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:53:18PM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>> The underscore at the beginning of _sre clearly indicates that the module
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (07/25/08 - 08/01/08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1951 open (+21) / 13354 closed (+15) / 15305 total (+36)
Open issues with patches: 615
Average
On 2008-08-01 15:38, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Barry Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I cannot see how I implement decode() for bytes objects using the C API
for PyCXX library,
I'd assuming that I should find a PyBytes_Decode function
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Barry Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I cannot see how I implement decode() for bytes objects using the C API
>> for PyCXX library,
>>
>> I'd assuming that I should find a PyBytes_Decode function but cannot find it
>> in beta 2.
>>
>> W
On 2008-08-01 15:06, Barry Scott wrote:
I cannot see how I implement decode() for bytes objects using the C API
for PyCXX library,
I'd assuming that I should find a PyBytes_Decode function but cannot
find it
in beta 2.
What is the preferred way to do this?
PyUnicode_FromEncodedObject() shou
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Barry Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot see how I implement decode() for bytes objects using the C API
> for PyCXX library,
>
> I'd assuming that I should find a PyBytes_Decode function but cannot find it
> in beta 2.
>
> What is the preferred way to do thi
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:20:15PM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> * Jackilyn Hoxworth
She was a Google SoC person in 2006; since she hasn't done anything
subsequently, her commit privs can be revoked.
--amk
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.or
I cannot see how I implement decode() for bytes objects using the C API
for PyCXX library,
I'd assuming that I should find a PyBytes_Decode function but cannot
find it
in beta 2.
What is the preferred way to do this?
Barry
___
Python-Dev mailing l
Cesare Di Mauro wrote:
Nick Coghlan write:
Sebastien Loisel wrote:
Dear Raymond,
Thank you for your email.
I think much of this thread is a repeat of conversations
that were held for PEP 225:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0225/
That PEP is marked as deferred. Maybe it's time to
bring
15 matches
Mail list logo
