On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I'm
happy to announce the release candidate 1 of Python 2.5.5.
This is a source-only release that only includes security fixes. The
last full bug-fix release of Python 2.5 was Python 2.5.4. Users are
encouraged to upgrade to the la
Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> "M.-A. Lemburg" writes:
>
>>
>> Naive users won't have PYTHONPATH or any other Python environment
>> variables setup.
>>
>> Really, if you know that you are going to run Python 3 instead of
>> Python 2 or vice-versa it's easy enough to run
>
> You don't even know that you'r
"M.-A. Lemburg" writes:
>
> Naive users won't have PYTHONPATH or any other Python environment
> variables setup.
>
> Really, if you know that you are going to run Python 3 instead of
> Python 2 or vice-versa it's easy enough to run
You don't even know that you're going to run python. I have 40 p
On 14/01/2010 21:02, Nick Coghlan wrote:
However, I agree that that is a fairly unlikely scenario (since
preinstalled Pythons tend not to rely on the e
Well, on the other hand I think that during the next few years it will
be increasingly common for developers (and possibly users) to have
Pytho
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 AM, sstein...@gmail.com > Or, how about
>>> just removing the antiquated use of environment variables altogether
>>> from Python 3 and avoid the issue completely.
>>>
>>> -1. They have their use,
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 AM, sstein...@gmail.com > Or, how about
>> just removing the antiquated use of environment variables altogether
>> from Python 3 and avoid the issue completely.
>>
>> -1. They have their use, but more in controlled situat
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>> From: Jesse Noller
>
>> I'm generally +1 - but given I know that Django 1.2 is slated to
>> implement something somewhat similar, I'm interested to hear how this
>> proposal meshes with their plan(s)..
>
> Django 1.2 will most likely not impl
On Jan 14, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>> From: Jesse Noller
>
>> I'm generally +1 - but given I know that Django 1.2 is slated to
>> implement something somewhat similar, I'm interested to hear how this
>> proposal meshes with their plan(s)..
>
> Django 1.2 will most likely not imple
> From: Jesse Noller
> I'm generally +1 - but given I know that Django 1.2 is slated to
> implement something somewhat similar, I'm interested to hear how this
> proposal meshes with their plan(s)..
Django 1.2 will most likely not implement logging - they're now in feature
freeze for big featur
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> In October 2009 I created PEP 391 to propose a new method of configuring
> logging using dictionaries:
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0391/
>
> In November 2009 I posted to this list that the PEP was ready for review.
>
> I have had n
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> In October 2009 I created PEP 391 to propose a new method of
> configuring logging using dictionaries:
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0391/
Although one minor comment: you can probably remove the note about the
"ext://" and "cfg://" prefixes being provisional at this
Paul Moore wrote:
> 2010/1/14 Vinay Sajip :
>> So, can you please indicate your vote for or against incorporating PEP 391
>> into Python?
>
> I've no immediate need for the feature, but it would be good to have
> something like this, so I'm +1.
I'm in the same boat as Paul, but PEP 291 provides
2010/1/14 Vinay Sajip :
> So, can you please indicate your vote for or against incorporating PEP 391
> into Python?
I've no immediate need for the feature, but it would be good to have
something like this, so I'm +1.
Paul.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Py
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> So, can you please indicate your vote for or against incorporating PEP 391
> into Python?
I think the dict configuration scheme will be a great addition to the
logging module. :)
Schiavo
Simon
___
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
[..]
> So, can you please indicate your vote for or against incorporating PEP 391
> into Python? It would
> be nice if I could incorporate the changes before 2.7a3 is released! Ideally,
> I would like to check
> in the changes unless there are
In October 2009 I created PEP 391 to propose a new method of configuring
logging using dictionaries:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0391/
In November 2009 I posted to this list that the PEP was ready for review.
I have had numerous helpful comments from some of you, and I have incorporate
16 matches
Mail list logo
