I'm moving this thread to python-ideas, where it belongs.
I've looked at the implementation code (even stepped through it with
pdb!), read the sample/test code, and read the two papers on
animats.com fairly closely (they have a lot of overlap, and the memory
model described below seems copied verb
Of course I concur with the two posters above me, but in order to
advertise for my own shop... If you're stuck with a lot of newbie
questions like these you might want to try #python (the IRC channel on
irc.freenode.net). You're more likely to get quick successive
responses there than on other medi
Issue #5180 [1] presented an interesting challenge: how to unpickle
instances of old-style classes when a pickle created with 2.x is
loaded in 3.x python? The problem is that pickle protocol requires
that unpickled instances be created without calling the __init__
method. This is necessary becau
Hello.
We'are sorry but we cannot help you. This mailing list is to work on
developing Python (fixing bugs and adding new features to Python itself); if
you're having problems using Python, please find another forum. Probably
python-list (comp.lang.python) news group/mailing list is the best pl
On 28/06/2010 19:09, Zohair wrote:
I am a very new to python and have a small question..
I have a function:
set_time_at_next_pps(self, *args, **kwargs) but don't know how to use it...
Askign for your help please.
Hi Zoh,
This mailing list is for the development *of* Python, not for questi
I am a very new to python and have a small question..
I have a function:
set_time_at_next_pps(self, *args, **kwargs) but don't know how to use it...
Askign for your help please.
Cheers,
Zoh
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Access-a-function-tp29008798p29008798.html
Sent
Hello,
I need to send logging module output over the network. The module has
everything to make this happen, except security. SocketHandler and
DatagramHandler examples are using pickle module that is said to be
insecure. SocketHandler and DatagramHandler docs should at least
contain a warning abo
It would be interesting to see benchmark diagrams inline on one page
with overall summaries. I've posted a enhancement to
http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/issues/detail?id=145 if
somebody is going to look at that. I wonder if 32bit version can bring
more speedups?
--
anatoly t.
___
Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:28 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> Mark Dickinson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
>>>
>>> Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built with
>>> optimiza
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:28 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Mark Dickinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>> Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
>>
>> Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built with
>> optimization enabled, as we've already
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> fyi - newthreading has been picked up by lwn.
> http://lwn.net/Articles/393822/#Comments
Do you know if any of the commenters is Nagle himself (and if so,
which)? The discussion is hard to follow since the context of replies
isn't always
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Mark Dickinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>> Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
>>
>> Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built with
>> optimization enabled, as we've already seen at least twice.
>
> Then le
Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
>
> Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built with
> optimization enabled, as we've already seen at least twice.
Then let me put it this way:
How many
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built with
optimization enabled, as we've already seen at least twice.
> and how do you know
> whether the compiler accepts -g as option ?
Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:38 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 13:37, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand the importance of allowing AC_PROG_CC to set
> CFLAGS (if CFLAG
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:38 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 13:37, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the importance of allowing AC_PROG_CC to set
CFLAGS (if CFLAGS is undefined at the point
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> R. David Murray wrote:
>
>> Having such a poly_str type would probably make my life easier.
>
> A thought on this poly_str type: perhaps it could be
> called "ascii", since that's what it would have to be
> restricted to, and have
>
> a'xxx'
>
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 13:37, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
AC_PROG_CC is the macro that sets CFLAGS to -g -O2 on gcc-based
systems
(http://www.gn
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:55:26 +0530, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:28:45PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > Thinking way outside the square, and probably the pale
> > as well, maybe @ could be pressed into service as an
> > infix operator, with
> >
> > s...@i
> >
> > being equ
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:28:45PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> A thought on this poly_str type: perhaps it could be
> called "ascii", since that's what it would have to be
> restricted to, and have
>
> a'xxx'
>
> as a literal syntax for it, seeing as literals seem to
> be one of its main use cas
R. David Murray wrote:
Having such a poly_str type would probably make my life easier.
A thought on this poly_str type: perhaps it could be
called "ascii", since that's what it would have to be
restricted to, and have
a'xxx'
as a literal syntax for it, seeing as literals seem to
be one of
21 matches
Mail list logo
