On 11 Jul, 2010, at 1:05, Tal Einat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
>
> I have been using IDLE since 2002 and have been doing my best to help
> maintain and further develop IDLE since 2005.
>
> In recent years IDLE has received negligible i
On 11 Jul, 2010, at 6:23, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> 2010/7/10 Miki Tebeka :
>> Hello Tal,
>>
>>> I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
>> -1.
>> One of the biggest "selling points" for me when switching to python was the
>> "out of the box" working IDE with REPL, syntax
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> By "never had a problem" do you mean using some of the latest versions
> ? Here, running "idle" from a mac terminal and trying to type: print
> "hi" crashes when entering the quotation mark.
Huh? Works fine for me. Python 2.6.1, OSX 10.6.
On Jul 10, 2010, at 9:23 PM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> 2010/7/10 Miki Tebeka :
>> Hello Tal,
>>
>>> I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
>> -1.
-1 from me too.
IDLE is the tool I almost always used to introduce people to Python.
FWIW, I've run in on a Mac and Windows
2010/7/10 Miki Tebeka :
> Hello Tal,
>
>> I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
> -1.
> One of the biggest "selling points" for me when switching to python was the
> "out of the box" working IDE with REPL, syntax highliting and a debugger.
> The only other candidate I thi
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 02:32:04PM -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
> FTP access also more often reflected the actual file hierarchy of the
> machine, so trying that path as a system path is more likely to work
> that I'd expect to see for HTTP.
I see the reason. But I doubt if this is a reliable approach
Hello Tal,
> I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
-1.
One of the biggest "selling points" for me when switching to python was the
"out of the box" working IDE with REPL, syntax highliting and a debugger.
The only other candidate I think of to replace IDLE might be IPyth
On 7/10/2010 7:05 PM, Tal Einat wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
-1 I use it daily. On Windows, it works better in many ways than the
awful interactive command window, which I almost never use. I would
rather the latter be replaced.
I have bee
Hello,
I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
I have been using IDLE since 2002 and have been doing my best to help
maintain and further develop IDLE since 2005.
In recent years IDLE has received negligible interest and attention from the
Python community. During this t
On 07/07/2010 12:30 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 07.07.2010 18:09, schrieb Michael Foord:
I would say that the major use of docstrings is for interactive help - so
interactive readability should be *the most important* (but perhaps not only)
factor when considering how to format standard librar
Am 10.07.2010 10:32, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:32 +1000
>> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>>> With the trunk closed to new development, should we switch
>>> http://docs.python.org/dev/ to show the docs built from the Py3k
>
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:32 +1000
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> With the trunk closed to new development, should we switch
>> http://docs.python.org/dev/ to show the docs built from the Py3k
>> branch?
>
> Well, that page already says “Python
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:32 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> With the trunk closed to new development, should we switch
> http://docs.python.org/dev/ to show the docs built from the Py3k
> branch?
Well, that page already says “Python v3.2a0 documentation” to me.
cheers
Antoine.
_
With the trunk closed to new development, should we switch
http://docs.python.org/dev/ to show the docs built from the Py3k
branch? (The in-development Py3k docs are currently at dev/py3k/)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_
14 matches
Mail list logo
