Re: [Python-Dev] My work on Python3 and non-ascii paths is done

2010-10-18 Thread Éric Araujo
Congratulations Victor! This is not a small feat. The PSU should send you cookies to thank you, but they won’t since they don’t exist and ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe:

Re: [Python-Dev] My work on Python3 and non-ascii paths is done

2010-10-18 Thread Ron Adam
On 10/18/2010 08:53 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, Seven months after my first commit related to this issue, the full test suite of Python 3.2 pass with ASCII, ISO-8859-1 and UTF-8 locale encodings in a non- ascii source directory. It means that Python 3.2 now process correctly filenames in all

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Ron Adam
On 10/18/2010 07:07 PM, R. David Murray wrote: Seriously, though, what it indicates is indicates is that we need a unit test for the patch to be complete. We have a number of issues with patches but no tests, I believe. Which order 'unit test' and 'fix' occur in is arbitrary in practice. I

[Python-Dev] My work on Python3 and non-ascii paths is done

2010-10-18 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, Seven months after my first commit related to this issue, the full test suite of Python 3.2 pass with ASCII, ISO-8859-1 and UTF-8 locale encodings in a non- ascii source directory. It means that Python 3.2 now process correctly filenames in all modules, build scripts and other utilities, wit

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread R. David Murray
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:42:08 +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:31:24 +0200 > Georg Brandl wrote: > > > > This is probably sophistry, but if an issue is invalid, it doesn't need > > a patch :) > > Not only, but it generally gets closed too. > > > The first stage seems to be

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted ” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread R. David Murray
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:20:13 +0200, wrote: > Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different > interpretations of the “accepted” resolution: > > > Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the > > bug is valid. > > Daniel Stutzbach and I are (were) tw

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:31:24 +0200 Georg Brandl wrote: > > This is probably sophistry, but if an issue is invalid, it doesn't need > a patch :) Not only, but it generally gets closed too. > The first stage seems to be "unit test needed" anyway, which > sounds to me a bit like "needs to be check

Re: [Python-Dev] Digital video basics tutorial

2010-10-18 Thread Janzert
On 10/18/2010 3:33 PM, Janzert wrote: http://xiph.org/video/vid1.shtml Sorry, sent to the wrong place. Janzert ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org

[Python-Dev] Digital video basics tutorial

2010-10-18 Thread Janzert
http://xiph.org/video/vid1.shtml ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 18.10.2010 21:28, schrieb Michael Foord: > On 18/10/2010 20:24, Georg Brandl wrote: >> Am 18.10.2010 21:04, schrieb Michael Foord: >>>On 18/10/2010 19:18, Georg Brandl wrote: Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: > >>

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Foord
On 18/10/2010 20:24, Georg Brandl wrote: Am 18.10.2010 21:04, schrieb Michael Foord: On 18/10/2010 19:18, Georg Brandl wrote: Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw: On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different inte

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 18.10.2010 21:04, schrieb Michael Foord: > On 18/10/2010 19:18, Georg Brandl wrote: >> Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw: >>> On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: >>> Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different interpretations of the “accepte

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Foord
On 18/10/2010 19:18, Georg Brandl wrote: Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw: On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different interpretations of the “accepted” resolution: Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, no

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: > >>Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different >>interpretations of the “accepted” resolution: >> >>> Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the >>> bug is

Re: [Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted ” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: >Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different >interpretations of the “accepted” resolution: > >> Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the >> bug is valid. I'm with Raymond; I've always used 'accepte

[Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted ” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Éric Araujo
Hi everyone Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different interpretations of the “accepted” resolution: > Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the > bug is valid. Daniel Stutzbach and I are (were) two users of the second meaning. It’s more useful

Re: [Python-Dev] How to get commit access

2010-10-18 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Hello Chandrasekar, On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:05:56PM +0530, chandru wrote: > I am waiting for the bug Issue5111 (httplib: wrong Host header when connecting > to IPv6 litteral URL)  to be fixed for a very long. I just had a look at the bug. Looks like a minor change and tests are there too. I sh

Re: [Python-Dev] Fixing zipfile.BadZipfile to zipfile.BadZipFile

2010-10-18 Thread Éric Araujo
Hello (A bit of context: The original message comes from bug #2775, “Implement PEP 3108”, a meta-bug tracking stdlib reorganization for py3k.) > I am very glad you're reorganizing the Standard Library. Thumbs up! I > hope everything will comply to PEP 8 after you're done. You may have missed the

[Python-Dev] How to get commit access

2010-10-18 Thread chandru
I am waiting for the bug Issue5111 (httplib: wrong Host header when connecting to IPv6 litteral URL) to be fixed for a very long. Even I attached patches, test patches. How to get commit access so that I can fix such issues ( HTTP lib ) - Chandrasekar

[Python-Dev] About resolution “accepted ” on the tracker

2010-10-18 Thread Éric Araujo
Hi everyone [Sorry if this comes twice, connection errors here] Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different interpretations of the “accepted” resolution: > Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the > bug is valid. Daniel Stutzbach and I are (were

Re: [Python-Dev] Fixing zipfile.BadZipfile to zipfile.BadZipFile

2010-10-18 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: > (A note about PEP 8 compliance: Module names have been mostly fixed, but > not all function/method names, for example in logging and unittest.  If > I recall correctly, readability did not seem to make all the rewrites > worth it.) Correct. W

Re: [Python-Dev] Fixing zipfile.BadZipfile to zipfile.BadZipFile

2010-10-18 Thread Éric Araujo
Hello [Sorry if this comes twice, connection errors here] (A bit of context: The original message comes from bug #2775, “Implement PEP 3108”, a meta-bug tracking stdlib reorganization for py3k.) > I am very glad you're reorganizing the Standard Library. Thumbs up! I > hope everything will comply

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-10-18 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Hi Sridhar, Le 15/10/2010 18:50, Sridhar Ratnakumar a écrit : We definitely like to share our core Python patches for AIX 5.1/5.2 and other platforms. Great to hear that ActiveState shares their improvements for Python on AIX! Thanks for the patch in git, I will check it and try to open some