Hi all,
Apologies for emailing this list with such an apparently trivial question.
Is there some source of documentation or information on how Python is
benchmarked? I am aware of the Python regression testing module,
regrtest.py, which I presume, if profiled, would good be a good baseline
test.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
tleeuwenb...@gmail.com wrote:
PyPy maintains http://speed.pypy.org/, which provides very clear information
about the relative performance of PyPy trunk against some version of cpython
(presumably 2.6 or 2.7). I'm not aware of a similar site
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
tleeuwenb...@gmail.com wrote:
PyPy maintains http://speed.pypy.org/, which provides very clear information
about the relative performance of PyPy trunk against some
I guess I have my work cut out for me. It appears my preferred mail
reader, VM, is not supported out-of-the-box by GNU Emacs (they still
use Rmail and Babyl for some reason), and I'm not sure the investment
trying to get XEmacs built with MULE is worth the effort.
Anders
s...@pobox.com wrote:
I guess I have my work cut out for me. It appears my preferred mail reader,
VM, is not supported out-of-the-box by GNU Emacs (they still use Rmail and
Babyl for some reason), and I'm not sure the investment trying to get XEmacs
built with MULE is worth the effort.
Use a
I'm planning a change to logging.basicConfig to add an optional handlers
keyword argument which defaults to None.
If specified, this should be an iterable of already created handlers, which will
be added to the root logger (if it doesn't already have any handlers). Any
handler in the iterable
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:35:08 + (UTC)
Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I'm planning a change to logging.basicConfig to add an optional handlers
keyword argument which defaults to None.
If specified, this should be an iterable of already created handlers, which
will
be added to
Hey all,
Not sure how real the security risk is here:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
Basically he is saying that if you store a list of blacklisted files
with names encoded in big-5 (or some other non-utf8 compatible encoding)
if those names are passed at the command line, or
On 3/29/2011 12:35 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
I'm planning a change to logging.basicConfig to add an optional handlers
keyword argument which defaults to None.
If specified, this should be an iterable of already created handlers, which will
be added to the root logger (if it doesn't already have
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:23:25 +0100
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
Hey all,
Not sure how real the security risk is here:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
Basically he is saying that if you store a list of blacklisted files
with names encoded in big-5 (or some
Not sure how real the security risk is here:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
Basically he is saying that if you store a list of blacklisted files
with names encoded in big-5 (or some other non-utf8 compatible encoding)
if those names are passed at the command line, or otherwise
Le 29/03/2011 02:16, vinay.sajip a écrit :
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bfa2a8d91859
changeset: 69034:bfa2a8d91859
branch: 2.6
parent: 68802:b99c94261225
user:Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk
date:Tue Mar 29 01:07:50 2011 +0100
summary:
Issue #11639:
In a message of Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:23:25 BST, Michael Foord writes:
Hey all,
Not sure how real the security risk is here:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
Basically he is saying that if you store a list of blacklisted files
with names encoded in big-5 (or some other non-utf8
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:23:25PM +0100, Michael Foord wrote:
Hey all,
Not sure how real the security risk is here:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
Basically he is saying that if you store a list of blacklisted files
with names encoded in big-5 (or some other non-utf8
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I am bothered by mutually exclusive parameters. This is one reason I was
glad to see cmp eliminated from list.sort. Quick: what happens if one
passes both cmp and key to list.sort? There are three reasonable
possibilities. As far as I can read, the answer
The node specified by the designator in the subject of your message
(22663) does not exist.
Subject was: [issue22663]
Mail Gateway Help
=
Incoming messages are examined for multiple parts:
. In a multipart/mixed message or part, each subpart is extracted and
examined. The
Le mardi 29 mars 2011 à 19:23 +0100, Michael Foord a écrit :
Hey all,
Not sure how real the security risk is here:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
Basically he is saying that if you store a list of blacklisted files
with names encoded in big-5 (or some other non-utf8
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 22:40, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
The lesson here seems to be if you have to use blacklists, and you
use unicode strings for those blacklists, also make sure the string
you compare with doesn't have surrogates.
For that matter, what happens with combining
The lesson here seems to be if you have to use blacklists, and you
use unicode strings for those blacklists, also make sure the string
you compare with doesn't have surrogates.
//Lennart
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Le mardi 29 mars 2011 à 22:40 +0200, Lennart Regebro a écrit :
The lesson here seems to be if you have to use blacklists, and you
use unicode strings for those blacklists, also make sure the string
you compare with doesn't have surrogates.
No. '\u4f60\u597d'.encode('big5').decode('latin1')
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:40:01 +0200
Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
The lesson here seems to be if you have to use blacklists, and you
use unicode strings for those blacklists, also make sure the string
you compare with doesn't have surrogates.
Not really. As everyone said, this can
'\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER O}\N{COMBINING DIAERESIS}' != '\N{LATIN SMALL
LETTER O WITH DIAERESIS}'
I guess the filesystem shouldn't treat these as the same (even though
they are), but what if some webservice does? I suspect you should
normalize both strings before comparing them in any
s...@pobox.com writes:
My only issues now are:
* make sure the ediff and vc packages recognize version-controlled files
(It seems they do, but I haven't put them through their paces)
The ‘vc’ package (I'm using Debian's GNU Emacs 23.2.1) now recognises
DVCS-controlled *files*, and works
On Mar 30, 2011, at 09:20 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
The ‘vc’ package (I'm using Debian's GNU Emacs 23.2.1) now recognises
DVCS-controlled *files*, and works well with them. It's still unaware
that modern VCS deals with project *trees*, so works only at an
individual file level. Still quite useful
On 3/29/2011 4:02 PM, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
Terry Reedytjre...@udel.edu wrote:
# Experiment with 2.7 shows that cmp wins. Though too late to change, I
consider this the worst choice of three. I think an exception should be
raised. Failing that, I think key should win on the basis that if
On 3/29/2011 2:23 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
Not sure how real the security risk is here:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
Basically he is saying that if you store a list of blacklisted files
with names encoded in big-5 (or some other non-utf8 compatible encoding)
if those names are passed
I'm wondering if it is a reasonable idea to have .hgignore exclude all
files from 'Lib/site-packages' and 'Scripts'? As I install packages
into my source builds, a 'hg status' lists *many* files in both those
directories forcing me to scroll up a number of pages to see files which
have
Hi Nick, Jesse,
Thanks both for your responses, it's much appreciated! It's very useful to
have a clear pointer to the right place to begin looking.
Regards,
-Tennessee
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Nick Coghlan
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:11:45 +1100, Mark Hammond mhamm...@skippinet.com.au
wrote:
I'm wondering if it is a reasonable idea to have .hgignore exclude all
files from 'Lib/site-packages' and 'Scripts'? As I install packages
into my source builds, a 'hg status' lists *many* files in both those
On 30/03/2011 12:09 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:11:45 +1100, Mark Hammondmhamm...@skippinet.com.au
wrote:
I'm wondering if it is a reasonable idea to have .hgignore exclude all
files from 'Lib/site-packages' and 'Scripts'? As I install packages
into my source builds, a
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:17:05 +1100, Mark Hammond mhamm...@skippinet.com.au
wrote:
On 30/03/2011 12:09 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
The solution is to add such
directories and/or files to your personal ignore list See the 'ignore'
entry under 'ui' in the hgrc documentation.
Yeah - but I
On 30/03/2011 1:37 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:17:05 +1100, Mark Hammondmhamm...@skippinet.com.au
wrote:
On 30/03/2011 12:09 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
The solution is to add such
directories and/or files to your personal ignore list See the 'ignore'
entry under 'ui' in
This is really great to hear and something I would be hugely interested in
contributing to.
Lurking has paid off :)
Nick
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
tleeuwenb...@gmail.com wrote:
PyPy
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:55:47PM +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le mardi 29 mars 2011 à 22:40 +0200, Lennart Regebro a écrit :
The lesson here seems to be if you have to use blacklists, and you
use unicode strings for those blacklists, also make sure the string
you compare with doesn't have
34 matches
Mail list logo
