Hi,
There are a couple of changes I'd like to make and would like some
guidance on policy:
http://bugs.python.org/issue6498 is a documentation bug which exists in
Python 2.6 and later. The patch in that bug touches the docs and a
comment in one source file. Is it acceptable to push that c
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:54:41 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > If someone actually considers this a desired feature, after using it, then
> > please add a field on the profile page to select autofolding or not. Also,
> > there should be a button
On 3/30/2011 6:39 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Really, surrogates are a red herring to this whole issue. The issue is that
the original code was trying to compare two different transformations of
byte sequences and expecting them to be equal. Let's say that you have the
following byte value::
On 3/30/2011 7:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
There's a lot of "noise" but that noise is useful. I find the
natural language summary to be much too terse and doesn't make it easy
to visualize said information as opposed to the form fields.
Yes, there is a good reason why database records are rou
Hi,
I pushed my faulthandler module into the default branch (Python 3.3).
Since one week, I fixed a lot of bugs (platform issues), improved the
tests and Antoine wrote a new implementation of dump_backtraces_later()
using a thread (instead of SIGALRM+alarm()). It should now work on all
platforms (
>> For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
>> setup at: http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html
Jesse> that's awesome. should we document how to donate/add a buildbot
Jesse> somewhere in the same section (or alongside)?
I must admit, it wasn't
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:54:41 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > The tracker was recently changed so that when I click on a link to a tracker
> > page, the page is properly displayed, but then a fraction of a second it
> > blinks and redisplays with
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Interesting - it comes straight up with the folded screen for me, no
> flickering at all.
I didn't get any flicker either and my first impression of the change
was also positive -- I usually skip straight to the comments the first
time I vis
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> The tracker was recently changed so that when I click on a link to a tracker
> page, the page is properly displayed, but then a fraction of a second it
> blinks and redisplays with the edit form hidden. This is so obnoxious to me
> that I no lo
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> The tracker was recently changed so that when I click on a link to a tracker
> page, the page is properly displayed, but then a fraction of a second it
> blinks and redisplays with the edit form hidden. This is so obnoxious to me
> that I no lo
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:36:43AM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:54, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Lennart is missing that you just need to use the same encoding
> > + surrogateescape (or stick with bytes) for decoding the byte strings that
> > you are comparing.
>
> You
I was wondering if it might be possible to have a channel (message
here, email to a list of slave owners or whatever) to mention when the
set of builders for the slaves is getting adjusted? A new builder
tree can burn a good deal of disk space in some cases for example
(each tree adds in the neigh
The tracker was recently changed so that when I click on a link to a
tracker page, the page is properly displayed, but then a fraction of a
second it blinks and redisplays with the edit form hidden. This is so
obnoxious to me that I no longer want to visit the tracker. Then I have
to find and c
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:14:10 -0400
> Jesse Noller wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> >
>> > For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
>> > setup at:
>> > http://docs.python.org
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:14:10 -0400
Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
> > setup at:
> > http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
>
>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
> setup at:
> http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
that's awesome. should we document how to donate/add a buildbot
somewhere in the
For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
setup at:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html
Regards
Antoine.
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:59:02 +0200
Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing my faulthandler repository on the custom buildbots, here are
> some
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:00:22 +0200
ezio.melotti wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/f722956afeac
> changeset: 405:f722956afeac
> user:Ezio Melotti
> date:Tue Mar 29 22:00:13 2011 +0300
> summary:
> Add a table of contents to the FAQ.
Could it be collapsed by default? It
Ubuntu 11.04 added support for multiarch libraries:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/MultiArch
At the moment, I don't care about issue 1294959 which I think addresses
building multiarch flavors of Python:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1294959
I have a much
Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 13:22 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
>> BTW: Why do you think that %.100s is not supported in
>> PyErr_Format() in Python 2.x ? PyString_FromFormatV()
>> does support this. The change to use Unicode error strings
>> introduced the problem, since PyUni
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 09:43 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>
>> Barry Warsaw writes:
>>>
>>> In case you missed it, there are now *three* Python modes. Tim Peters'
>>> original and best (in my completely unbiased opinion ) python-mode.el
>>> which is
On Mar 30, 2011, at 09:43 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>Barry Warsaw writes:
>>
>> In case you missed it, there are now *three* Python modes. Tim Peters'
>> original and best (in my completely unbiased opinion ) python-mode.el
>> which is still being developed, the older but apparently removed from E
On 3/30/2011 2:57 AM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
I posted link to this as comment, with my summary of thread.
I don't see your comment on the blog post. So either the author is
moderating comments and hasn't seen yours yet (likely)
My comment and Nick's
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:11:53 +0200
Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 17:59 +0200, Victor Stinner a écrit :
> > I'm testing my faulthandler repository on the custom buildbots, here are
> > some remarks and issues.
>
> Oh, I forgot something: there is an error on hg purge.
[...]
I
Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 17:59 +0200, Victor Stinner a écrit :
> I'm testing my faulthandler repository on the custom buildbots, here are
> some remarks and issues.
Oh, I forgot something: there is an error on hg purge.
Example on a Windows buildbot:
C:\Program Files\Mercurial\hg.EXE purge
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:59:02 +0200
Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> I cannot write "#" in the branch field to specify... the branch (only
> the repository). If the branch contains "#", the request looks to be
> ignored (without any warning/error). I merged my faulthandler branch
> into the default branc
Hi,
I'm testing my faulthandler repository on the custom buildbots, here are
some remarks and issues.
The form still refers to SVN ('Branch to build' is relative to
http://svn.python.org/projects/python.) => the branch is relative to
hg.python.org/
I cannot write "#" in the branch field to speci
On 3/29/2011 12:10 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
The possible flaw in python is this: Code like the blog poster wrote passes
python3 without an error or a warning. This gives the programmer no
feedback that they're doing something wrong until it actually bites them in
the foot in deployed code.
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:17:05 +1100
Mark Hammond wrote:
> On 30/03/2011 12:09 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:11:45 +1100, Mark Hammond
> > wrote:
> >> I'm wondering if it is a reasonable idea to have .hgignore exclude all
> >> files from 'Lib/site-packages' and 'Scripts'?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> I don't see your comment on the blog post. So either the author is
> moderating comments and hasn't seen yours yet (likely) or they don't want
> disagreement in their comments. ;)
My comment was sitting in the moderation queue last time
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Nick Stinemates wrote:
> This is really great to hear and something I would be hugely interested in
> contributing to.
> Lurking has paid off :)
> Nick
>
Once I get the machine in place, and the team engaged, I am sure
they'll be looking for help. As it stands, th
2011/3/29 Python tracker :
>
>
> The node specified by the designator in the subject of your message
> ("22663") does not exist.
>
> Subject was: "[issue22663]"
Aha.
This email was probably generated by a commit hook because
this changeset http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/dd852a0f92d6
has a typo i
Barry Warsaw writes:
>
> In case you missed it, there are now *three* Python modes. Tim Peters'
> original and best (in my completely unbiased opinion ) python-mode.el
> which is still being developed, the older but apparently removed from Emacs
> python.el and the 'new' (so I've heard) python.e
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/29/2011 2:23 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
> Not sure how real the security risk is here:
>>
>> http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
>>
>> Basically he is saying that if you store a list of blacklisted files
>> with names encoded in big-5 (
34 matches
Mail list logo
