>> + if (start >= length || end < start) {
>> + assert(end == length);
>> + return PyUnicode_New(0, 0);
>> + }
>
> That assert doesn't look right.
Oh, you're right. I added it for the first case: start>=length. But
the assertion is really useless, I removed it. Thanks!
Victor
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, victor.stinner
wrote:
> + if (start >= length || end < start) {
> + assert(end == length);
> + return PyUnicode_New(0, 0);
> + }
That assert doesn't look right.
Consider:
"abc"[4:1]
Unless I'm missing something, "end" will be 1, but "lengt
On 2012-05-02, at 2:46 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 01:12 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> That would be great! First thing is addressing Guido's concerns from
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117515.html and then
>> handling any issues you found. Not sure if Larr
On 2012-05-01, at 4:12 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> That would be great! First thing is addressing Guido's concerns from
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117515.html and then
> handling any issues you found. Not sure if Larry was asking about this out of
> curiosity or be
Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
to date at all?
I occasionally update them when I see issues with them. Your specific
issue, I missed so far.
If you would like to make this kind of update, please let me know.
Regards,
Martin
__
On 02.05.2012 17:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/2/2012 10:16 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
Hi all,
Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
to date at all? I just noticed that the 2.4.6 download page
(http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.6/) says things like
"Python 2
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> On 02/05/2012 19.33, Michael Foord wrote:
>>
>> On 2 May 2012, at 16:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>>
>>> I would send the above to webmas...@python.org (should be at the bottom
>>> of pages). We develop CPython but do not directly manage the websit
On 02/05/2012 19.33, Michael Foord wrote:
On 2 May 2012, at 16:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
I would send the above to webmas...@python.org (should be at the bottom of
pages). We develop CPython but do not directly manage the website.
Not true. The download pages are administered by the release manag
On Thu, 3 May 2012 00:25:05 +0800
Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> > What are the characteristics of your machine? We already have several
> > Linux x86/x86-64 buildbots... That said, we could also toy with other
> > build options if someone has
On 2 May 2012, at 16:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/2/2012 10:16 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
>> to date at all? I just noticed that the 2.4.6 download page
>> (http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.6/) says t
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> What are the characteristics of your machine? We already have several
> Linux x86/x86-64 buildbots... That said, we could also toy with other
> build options if someone has a request about that.
It is not very unique. It is Intel x86 (32 b
On 5/2/2012 10:16 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
Hi all,
Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
to date at all? I just noticed that the 2.4.6 download page
(http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.6/) says things like
"Python 2.4 is now in security-fix-only mode" (whe
On Wed, 2 May 2012 13:13:15 +1000
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> > Also, I think the instructions in the wiki could be improved. I was
> > not able to su - buildbot after installing through package manager. I
> > shall edit it once I have set it u
On Wed, 2 May 2012 14:07:09 +0800
Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > I'm not sure how useful it is to have a build slave which you can't
> > commit to having for more than 3 months. So I'm -0 on adding this
> > slave, but it is up to Antoine to d
Hi all,
Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
to date at all? I just noticed that the 2.4.6 download page
(http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.6/) says things like
"Python 2.4 is now in security-fix-only mode" (whereas in fact it no
longer gets even s
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> I'm not sure if MSVC and MSVC++ are the same thing, but I surely remember
> reports by MSVC users only a few years ago that Cython generated C code
> contained a declaration after an executed code at some point, and that
> failed to compile f
On Wed, 02 May 2012 21:37:35 +0800, Matt Joiner wrote:
> On May 2, 2012 6:00 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700
> > Larry Hastings wrote:
> > >
> > > I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its name
> > > rhymes with Bike Row Soft Frizz
Matt Joiner, 02.05.2012 15:37:
> On May 2, 2012 6:00 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700
>> Larry Hastings wrote:
>>>
>>> I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its name
>>> rhymes with Bike Row Soft Frizz You All See Muss Muss.) But even tha
On May 2, 2012 6:00 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700
> Larry Hastings wrote:
> >
> > I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its name
> > rhymes with Bike Row Soft Frizz You All See Muss Muss.) But even that
> > compiler added this extens
Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Mark Shannon wrote:
Or maybe three parts?
New features.
Behavioural changes (i.e. bug fixes)
Performance enhancements
The release PEPs are mainly there for *our* benefit, not end users.
For end users, it's the What's New document that matte
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Mark Shannon wrote:
> Or maybe three parts?
> New features.
> Behavioural changes (i.e. bug fixes)
> Performance enhancements
The release PEPs are mainly there for *our* benefit, not end users.
For end users, it's the What's New document that matters. For
performa
On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700
Larry Hastings wrote:
>
> I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its name
> rhymes with Bike Row Soft Frizz You All See Muss Muss.) But even that
> compiler added this extension in the early 90s.
>
> Do we officially support any C co
Georg Brandl wrote:
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm happy to announce the
third alpha release of Python 3.3.0.
This is a preview release, and its use is not recommended in
production settings.
Python 3.3 includes a range of improvements of the 3.x series, as well
as easier porting
Right now the CPython trunk religiously declares all variables at the
tops of scopes, before any code, because this is all C89 permits. Back
in the 90s all the C compilers took a page out of the C++ playbook and
independently, but nearly without exception, extended the language to
allow you
On 02.05.2012 08:07, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
I'm not sure how useful it is to have a build slave which you can't
commit to having for more than 3 months. So I'm -0 on adding this
slave, but it is up to Antoine to decide.
I am likely swit
25 matches
Mail list logo
