I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its name
rhymes with Bike Row Soft Frizz You All See Muss Muss.) But even that
compiler added this extension in the early 90s.
No, it didn't. The MSVC version that we currently use (VS 2008) still
doesn't support it.
Regards,
Marti
On 02.05.2012 15:37, Matt Joiner wrote:
On May 2, 2012 6:00 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" mailto:solip...@pitrou.net>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700
> Larry Hastings mailto:la...@hastings.org>> wrote:
> >
> > I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its
name
>
Antoine Pitrou writes:
> I have to ask - is email obfuscation still useful these days?
It's hard to say. It's still a FAQ on Mailman lists, so people still
believe it's useful. I don't think there's hard evidence either way
(even guessing depends on the economics of the spamming business, and
On Sunday, May 6, 2012, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 06, 2012, at 09:31 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> >I have to ask - is email obfuscation still useful these days?
>
> I think it's more important that Python developers (especially those
> submitting or pronouncing on PEPs) can be contacted by oth
On May 06, 2012, at 03:08 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>I'll see if I can figure out something - I may just put in text like
>"if you're at all unsure about what needs to be done, email the PEP
>editors anyway".
The diff looks good, thanks.
-Barry
___
Pytho
On May 06, 2012, at 09:31 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>I have to ask - is email obfuscation still useful these days?
I think it's more important that Python developers (especially those
submitting or pronouncing on PEPs) can be contacted by other Python
developers. I *personally* don't care about
Carl Meyer oddbird.net> writes:
> them in sync). IOW, if you want real full isolation from a system
> Python, you build your own Python, you don't use pyvenv.
For the interpreter you can use your own Python, but you would still use pyvenv,
as the venv is still useful for you to have an isolated
On 05/05/2012 12:41 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
1) Document it and provide a tool for easily upgrading a venv in this
situation. This may be adequate. In practice the situation is quite rare:
2.6.8/2.7.3 is the only actual example in the history of
On 05/05/2012 04:40 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 04 May 2012 14:49:03 -0600
Carl Meyer wrote:
3) Symlink the interpreter rather than copying. I include this here for
the sake of completeness, but it's already been rejected due to
significant problems on older Windows' and OS X.
Perhaps s
On 05/05/2012 02:38 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
Personally, I expect that "always update your virtual environment
binaries after updating the system Python to a new point release" will
itself become a recommended practice when using virtual environments.
Of course
On Sun, 06 May 2012 18:58:10 +0100
shibturn wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 5:07pm, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 May 2012 17:56:55 +0200
> >> summary:
> >>Make AcquirerProxy.acquire() support timeout argument
> >
> > Should it have a Misc/NEWS entry? (and a doc addition perhaps?)
>
> Since pro
On 06/05/2012 5:07pm, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2012 17:56:55 +0200
summary:
Make AcquirerProxy.acquire() support timeout argument
Should it have a Misc/NEWS entry? (and a doc addition perhaps?)
Since proxies for locks/semaphores are supposed to work the same way as
the proxie
The node specified by the designator in the subject of your message
("14965") does not exist.
Subject was: "[issue14965]"
Mail Gateway Help
=
Incoming messages are examined for multiple parts:
. In a multipart/mixed message or part, each subpart is extracted and
examined.
On Sun, 06 May 2012 17:56:55 +0200
richard.oudkerk wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b4a1d9287780
> changeset: 76800:b4a1d9287780
> user:Richard Oudkerk
> date:Sun May 06 16:45:02 2012 +0100
> summary:
> Make AcquirerProxy.acquire() support timeout argument
Should it
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 16:45:32 +1000
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> For the moment, I suggest leaving your email address out of this
>> field. The email obfuscation is applied on a field-by-field basis, and
>> the formatter for reStructuredText PE
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:08:52 +1000
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> Agreed we should have a new header field to record the BDFL delegate,
>> but I think I'll go with BDFL-Delegate rather than PEP-Czar.
>
> +1 for overthrowing czars!
I expect PEP
On Sun, 6 May 2012 16:45:32 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> For the moment, I suggest leaving your email address out of this
> field. The email obfuscation is applied on a field-by-field basis, and
> the formatter for reStructuredText PEPs actually lives in the docutils
> upstream rather than being
On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:08:52 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> Agreed we should have a new header field to record the BDFL delegate,
> but I think I'll go with BDFL-Delegate rather than PEP-Czar.
+1 for overthrowing czars!
Regards
Antoine.
___
Python-De
18 matches
Mail list logo
