On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> See http://bugs.python.org/issue9527 .
> With datetime.timestamp() method committed, I would like to get back
> to this issue.
What was committed? The bug only mentions a ch
On 6/8/2012 6:41 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Dan Stromberg wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> Dan Stromberg wrote:
>>> Did the import semantics change in cpython 3.3a4?
>>>
>>> I used to be able to import treap.py even though I had a treap
>>> directory in my cwd. With
Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Dan Stromberg wrote:
Did the import semantics change in cpython 3.3a4?
I used to be able to import treap.py even though I had a treap
directory in my cwd. With 3.3a4, I have to rename the treap
directory to see treap.py.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> See http://bugs.python.org/issue9527 .
>
With datetime.timestamp() method committed, I would like to get back
to this issue. In some sense, an inverse of datetime.timestamp() is
missing from the datetime module. Given a POSIX timestam
Le 08/06/2012 20:29, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> P.S. Do we need a python-implementations mailing list or
something for
> discussing overall VM-related stuff among all VMs instead of
always bringing
> this up on python-dev? E.g. I wish I had a place where I could
get all
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:08 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> The are four issues: (1) we build the python3 docs using python2, so 'make
> doctest' on python3 doesn't currently work
For reference: http://bugs.python.org/issue10224. Are there any others?
-eric
___
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:06 AM, wrote:
> I hereby predict that Microsoft will revert this decision, and that VS
> Express
> 11 will be able to build CPython.
And your prediction was right on :-) :
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/06/08/visual-studio-express-2012-for-windows-de
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
> This would have been handy for feedback on sys.implementation.
FWIW I followed the discussion and am happy with the result :)
-Frank
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:21 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> I think a python-implementations list would be a fantastic idea - I
>> sometimes miss multi-implementation discussions in python-dev, or at
>> least come in very late.
>
>
> If
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:21 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > R. David already replied to this, but just to reiterate: tests can always
> > get updated, and code that fixes a bug (and leaving a file open can be
> > considered a bug) can a
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> R. David already replied to this, but just to reiterate: tests can always
> get updated, and code that fixes a bug (and leaving a file open can be
> considered a bug) can also go in. It's just stuff like code refactoring,
> speed improvements,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:39 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com <
fwierzbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Matti Picus
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The windows port of pypy makes special demands on stdlib, specifically
> that
> >> files a
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:39:47 -0700, "fwierzbi...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Matti Picus wrote:
> >>
> >> The windows port of pypy makes special demands on stdlib, specifically that
> >> files are explicitly closed. T
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 07:20:55 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 08:55 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:08:09 +0100, Sam Partington
> > wrote:
>
> >> Wouldn't that be better written as a doctest and so avoid any other
> >> typos?
> >
> > Possibly, except (1) I don't t
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Matti Picus wrote:
>>
>> The windows port of pypy makes special demands on stdlib, specifically that
>> files are explicitly closed. There are some other minor issues, in order to
>> merge all the changes necessar
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Matti Picus wrote:
>
> The windows port of pypy makes special demands on stdlib, specifically that
> files are explicitly closed. There are some other minor issues, in order to
> merge all the changes necessary to get pypy windows up to speed, around 10
> modules or
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-06-01 - 2012-06-08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open3460 (+10)
closed 23354 (+46)
total 26814 (+56)
Open issues wit
The windows port of pypy makes special demands on stdlib, specifically that
files are explicitly closed. There are some other minor issues, in order to
merge all the changes necessary to get pypy windows up to speed, around 10
modules or at least their tests seem to need to be modified.
I have be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/07/2012 08:55 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:08:09 +0100, Sam Partington
> wrote:
>> Wouldn't that be better written as a doctest and so avoid any other
>> typos?
>
> Possibly, except (1) I don't think we currently actuall
PyPy 1.9 - Yard Wolf
We're pleased to announce the 1.9 release of PyPy. This release brings
mostly
bugfixes, performance improvements, other small improvements and overall
progress on the `numpypy`_ effort.
It also brings an improved situation on Windows a
Note: reply-to set to python-ideas.
Nick Coghlan writes:
> The inaccuracies in the analogy are why this is in the tutorial, not the
> language reference. All 3 else clauses are really their own thing.
Nick, for the purpose of the tutorial, actually there are 4 else
clauses: you need to disting
21 matches
Mail list logo
