On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Why don't you compile using python -OO and distribute only .pyo code?
>
Because .pyo files can be much larger than necessary, e.g. using my mnfy
project on decimal (with --safe-transforms) compared to -OO yields::
224K Lib/decimal.py
200K
Why don't you compile using python -OO and distribute only .pyo code?
Victor
2013/1/27 Kristján Valur Jónsson :
> We (CCP) are certainly compiling python without docstrings for our embedded
> platforms (that include the PS3)
> Anyone using python as en engine to be used by programs and not users
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:56:06 +0100, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> "R. David Murray" writes:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:42:59 +0100, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> >> Guido van Rossum writes:
> >>
> >> > It's like calling socket.settimeout(0.1) and then complaining that
> >> > urllib.urlopen() raises excepti
"R. David Murray" writes:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:42:59 +0100, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum writes:
>>
>> > It's like calling socket.settimeout(0.1) and then complaining that
>> > urllib.urlopen() raises exceptions
>>
>> but that's not what's happening. you'll see urllib.urlopen r
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:42:59 +0100, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> Guido van Rossum writes:
>
> > It's like calling socket.settimeout(0.1) and then complaining that
> > urllib.urlopen() raises exceptions
>
> but that's not what's happening. you'll see urllib.urlopen raising
> exceptions and only afterwa
Serhiy Storchaka, 27.01.2013 17:52:
> Is Boost Software License [1] compatible with Python license? Can I steal
> some code from Boost library [2]?
>
> [1] http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt
> [2] http://www.boost.org/
Depends on what you want to do with it after stealing it.
Assuming you want
Guido van Rossum writes:
> It's like calling socket.settimeout(0.1) and then complaining that
> urllib.urlopen() raises exceptions
but that's not what's happening. you'll see urllib.urlopen raising
exceptions and only afterwards realize that you called into some third
party library code that dec
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:56:51 +0100
> Charles-François Natali wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What's exactly the guideline for choosing between the "Library" and
> > "Extension modules" section when updating Misc/NEWS?
> > Is it just the fact that t
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 06:52:21PM +0200, Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> Is Boost Software License [1] compatible with Python license? Can I
> steal some code from Boost library [2]?
>
> [1] http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt
> [2] http://www.boost.org/
BSD-ish license? I think yes, it's compat
Is Boost Software License [1] compatible with Python license? Can I
steal some code from Boost library [2]?
[1] http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt
[2] http://www.boost.org/
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mai
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> I don't think such limitations are very useful in practice. Users
>> calling sys.setdefaultexec() will have to be sufficiently knowledgeable
>> to understand the implications, anyway.
We (CCP) are certainly compiling python without docstrings for our embedded
platforms (that include the PS3)
Anyone using python as en engine to be used by programs and not users will
appreciate the deletion of unneeded memory.
K
-Original Message-
From: Python-Dev [mailto:python-dev-bou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2013 10:31 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>>> Is it too late to get this into 2.7.3?
>>
>> Yes, it's far too late for 2.7.3, since that was released last
>> April. :) I think it could go into 2.7.4, though.
>
> Whoops, sorry. I thought I had rem
>> Is it too late to get this into 2.7.3?
>
> Yes, it's far too late for 2.7.3, since that was released last April.
> :) I think it could go into 2.7.4, though.
Whoops, sorry. I thought I had remembered some recent discussion of
an upcoming 2.7 micro. Off-by-one error, or just brain freeze? :-)
2013/1/27 Skip Montanaro :
> I hit a bug in the ctypes package on Solaris yesterday.
> Investigating, I found there is a patch:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue5289
>
> I applied it and verified that when run as a main program
> ctypes/util.py now works.
>
> Is it too late to get this into 2.7.3?
I hit a bug in the ctypes package on Solaris yesterday.
Investigating, I found there is a patch:
http://bugs.python.org/issue5289
I applied it and verified that when run as a main program
ctypes/util.py now works.
Is it too late to get this into 2.7.3? Given the nature of the patch
(a new block
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I don't think such limitations are very useful in practice. Users
> calling sys.setdefaultexec() will have to be sufficiently knowledgeable
> to understand the implications, anyway.
I've yet to hear a use case for being able to turn it off
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:23:15 +0100
Victor Stinner wrote:
> 2013/1/27 Guido van Rossum :
> > I had missed this detail. I agree that it should be exposed in the
> > interpreter. To my mind it is more like PYTHONPATH (which corresponds
> > roughly to sys.path manipulations) than like -R (which change
2013/1/27 Guido van Rossum :
> I had missed this detail. I agree that it should be exposed in the
> interpreter. To my mind it is more like PYTHONPATH (which corresponds
> roughly to sys.path manipulations) than like -R (which changes
> something that should never be changed again, otherwise the sa
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:56:51 +0100
Charles-François Natali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's exactly the guideline for choosing between the "Library" and
> "Extension modules" section when updating Misc/NEWS?
> Is it just the fact that the modified files live under Lib/ or Modules/?
>
> I've frequently ma
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Charles-François Natali
wrote:
> If the intended audience for this file are end users, ISTM that the
> only things that matters is that it's a library change, the fact that
> the modification impacted Python/C code isn't really relevant.
I have no objection to mer
Hi,
What's exactly the guideline for choosing between the "Library" and
"Extension modules" section when updating Misc/NEWS?
Is it just the fact that the modified files live under Lib/ or Modules/?
I've frequently made a mistake when updating Misc/NEWS, and when
looking at it, I'm not the only on
22 matches
Mail list logo
