OK, I'll hold off a bit on approving the PEP, but my intention is to
approve it. Go Alex go!
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 21 September 2014 08:22, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Sounds good. Maybe we should put the specifically targeted releases in
> PEP
> > 476?
> >
>
On 21 September 2014 08:22, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Sounds good. Maybe we should put the specifically targeted releases in PEP
> 476?
>
> Nick, do Christian's issues need to be mentioned in the PEP or should we
> just keep those in the corresponding tracker items?
They should be mentioned in th
I'm not sure of the right place to bring this up - I tried to on the
web-sig list itself, but the moderator rejected the post.
What I tried to post there was
"""Looks like *every* post to web-sig gets manually moderated. That seems
like it will make discussion rather hard: can we get that changed
Sounds good. Maybe we should put the specifically targeted releases in PEP
476?
Nick, do Christian's issues need to be mentioned in the PEP or should we
just keep those in the corresponding tracker items?
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 21 September 2014 03:05, Alex Ga
Ugh - this was in my mailbox shortly after the moderator action email
from mailman:
"No, this looks like the spam filter. Don't know what triggered it. Or
why it went to you. But the list moderation is turned off (except for
non-members posting to the list), and you yourself are not moderated,
On 21 September 2014 03:05, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> That sounds reasonable to me -- at this point I don't expect this to make it
> into 3.4.2; Nick has some working code on the ticket:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue22417 it's mostly missing documentation.
I also think it's more sensible to target 2.
That sounds reasonable to me -- at this point I don't expect this to make
it into 3.4.2; Nick has some working code on the ticket:
http://bugs.python.org/issue22417 it's mostly missing documentation.
Alex
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Nice. I just realized the relea
Nice. I just realized the release candidate for 3.4.2 is really close (RC1
Monday, final Oct 6, see PEP 429). What's your schedule for 3.4? I see no
date for 2.7.9 yet (but that could just be that PEP 373 hasn't been
updated). What about the Apple and Microsoft issues Christian pointed out?
Regard
Done and done.
Alex
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> +1 on Nick's suggestion. (Might also mention that this is the reason why
> both functions should exist and have compatible signatures.)
>
> Also please, please, please add explicit mention of Python 2.7, 3.4 and
> 3.
On 19.09.2014 18:53, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just updated the PEP to reflect the API suggestions from Nick, and the
> fact that the necessary changes to urllib were landed.
>
> I think this is ready for pronouncement, Guido?
There is still the issue with SSL_CERT_DIR and SSL_CERT_F
10 matches
Mail list logo
