I misinterpreted the side effect this code was triggering. It turns out
that any kwarg would have the desired effect as a side effect (as seen in
dummyvar='' being passed later in this file for the same purpose). I'm
looking at refactoring various uses of -E that interfere with running the
test su
Thanks for taking a look. I looked at inspect and I can't see anything
that needs to change since it's the caller rather than the receiver who has
more options after this PEP. Did you see anything in particular?
Best,
Neil
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Walter Dörwald
wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2
On 20 Jan 2015, at 17:34, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> My question first:
> test_ast is mostly generated code, but I can't find where it is being
> generated. I am pretty sure I know how to fix most of the introduced
> problems. Who is generating test_ast??
>
> Update:
>
> So far, I've done the followi
A mobile SIG is being formed, but it doesn't have a mailing list yet, else
that would be a good place to ask this question.
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 5:54:39 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Maybe try a list focused on Android development? Few people in the Python
> core development community have any A
In a function call with named arguments the code generated doesn't follow
that pattern:
dis.dis(lambda : f(a=1,b=2,c=3))
displays:
1 0 LOAD_GLOBAL 0 (foo)
3 LOAD_CONST 1 ('a')
6 LOAD_CONST 2 (1)
9 LOAD
