On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> It should be written in C. I thought you knew. :-)
>
It crossed my mind when we talked about the math module -- but I didn't
really think about it...
I guess it's okay to drop Decimal support (*). Complex support probably
> should be in
It should be written in C. I thought you knew. :-)
I guess it's okay to drop Decimal support (*). Complex support probably
should be in cmath.
But this is an amendmend to the PEP as accepted. If anyone cares about
these changes they should speak up, otherwise the PEP should be updated.
(*) Addin
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Chris Barker
wrote:
> I'll edit the text as you suggest,
>
Done.
> and then work on a patch -- I'm sure I'll have questions for Python-dev
> when I actually do that, but I'll get started on my own and see how far I
> get.
>
OK -- big question 1:
As far as
It's from five days ago. I asked Joshua to take a look at something, but I
guess he is busy.
Best,
Neil
—
The latest file there is from Feb 26, while your message that the patch was
ready for review is from today -- so is the
patch from five days ago the most recent?
--
~Ethan~
On Mon, Mar
On 03/02/2015 12:18 PM, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> Le lundi 2 mars 2015, Neil Girdhar a écrit :
>>>
>>> The patch is ready for review now, and I should have time this week to
>>> make changes and respond to comments.
>>
>> Where is the patch?
>
http://bugs.python.org/issue2292
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Where is the patch?
>
> Victor
>
> Le lundi 2 mars 2015, Neil Girdhar a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
>>
>> The patch is ready for review now, and I should have time this week to
>> make changes and respond to c
Where is the patch?
Victor
Le lundi 2 mars 2015, Neil Girdhar a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> The patch is ready for review now, and I should have time this week to
> make changes and respond to comments.
>
> Best,
>
> Neil
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Guido van Rossum > wrote:
>
>> I'm b
Hi everyone,
The patch is ready for review now, and I should have time this week to make
changes and respond to comments.
Best,
Neil
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm back, I've re-read the PEP, and I've re-read the long thread with "(no
> subject)".
>
> I think G
