On 22 Mar 2015 19:22, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21.03.15 13:46, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 19 March 2015 at 19:28, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is list of my ready for review patches. It is incomplete and
contains
only patches for which I don't expect
Pascal allows to define custom indexing. The indexes are defined on array declaration
myArray : Array[1..5] of Integer;
see http://pascal-programming.info/lesson10.php
However, in pascal array-size must be set at compile time, wich is rather annoying, but allows for some optimizations.
On 21.03.15 13:03, Victor Stinner wrote:
The \ is useful, it indicates that you cannot use keywords.
Wouldn't it confuse users?
If you want to drop \, modify the function to accept keywords.
Yes, this is a solution. But parsing keyword arguments is slower than
parsing positional
On 21.03.15 13:46, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 19 March 2015 at 19:28, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is list of my ready for review patches. It is incomplete and contains
only patches for which I don't expect objections or long discussion. Most
of them are relative easy and need
On 22/03/2015 15:12, Tim Golden wrote:
On 22/03/2015 14:44, Paul Moore wrote:
On which note, I'm assuming neither of the issues I've found are major
blockers. pip.exe doesn't work if Python is installed in a directory
with non-ASCII characters in the name can be worked around by using
python -m
On 22 March 2015 at 04:47, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 3/21/2015 12:41 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
How to document functions with optional positional parameters?
For example binascii.crc32(). It has two positional parameters, one is
mandatory, and one is optional with default
On 3/21/2015 10:46 PM, pedro santos wrote:
Hi, I'm an Art and CG student learning Python and today's exercise was
about positions in a tiled room. The fact that I had to check if a
position was inside the room and given that in a 1x1 room, 0.0 was
considered in and 1.0 was considered out, it
On 22 March 2015 at 07:46, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Mar 21, 2015, at 05:00 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
I sort of think (though I haven’t completely convinced myself) that adding
something like __version__ to a package is a work around to the fact that
we don’t have an API that lets
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Ian Lee ianlee1...@gmail.com wrote:
Guido,
In that case would you be open to a patch to update the PEP accordingly?
Only if it totally eradicate __version__ and similar from the PEP.
Additionally, does that official statement cover other dunder assignments
