On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.5 release
team, I'm relieved to announce the availability of Python 3.5.0b2.
Python 3.5.0b1 had a major regression (see
http://bugs.python.org/issue24285 for more information) and as such was
not suitable for testing Python 3.5.
On 05/30/2015 08:25 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
The buildbots currently live in a state of denial about the 3.5 branch.
Could someone whisper tenderly in their collective shell-like ears so that
they start building 3.5, in addition to 3.4 and t
On 5/31/15 8:39 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
What I would really like to see is a Python 3 (and if you really need
Python 2, here's how it differs) version of Python: Essential
Reference.
Agreed. If anyone has Python 3 books, talks, or resources that they
find helpful and of high quality, ple
"We are calling it 'embedable', but the rest of the world would call it
'portable', as in, runable from a usb stick"
I called it embeddable because it's not intended for direct use and is not
complete. There's no test suite, no documentation, no tkinter (pending high
demand), no pip, no site-pac
Florian Bruhin writes:
> I think a big issue here is the lack of good newcomer tutorials for
> Python 3.
My business students (who are hardly advanced programmers) don't take
tutorials seriously. They're way too focused on getting results. And
there it's the "Doing with Python" books that
ar
On 1 June 2015 at 00:44, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/31/2015 6:59 AM, Alexander Walters wrote:
>>
>> A better course of action would be to deprecate the non-portable
>> version. Other than setting the PATH envvar, why do we need to continue
>> even touching the system on install? It is highly anno
On 5/31/2015 10:15 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
The education community started switching a while back - if you watch
Carrie-Anne Philbin's PyCon UK 2014 keynote, one of her requests for
the broader Python community was for everyone else to just catch up
already in order to reduce student's confusion
* Nick Coghlan [2015-06-01 00:15:01 +1000]:
> On 31 May 2015 at 19:07, Ludovic Gasc wrote:
> > About Python 3 migration, I think that one of our best control stick is
> > newcomers, and by extension, Python trainers/teachers.
> > If newcomers learn first Python 3, when they will start to work
> >
On 5/31/2015 6:59 AM, Alexander Walters wrote:
A better course of action would be to deprecate the non-portable
version. Other than setting the PATH envvar, why do we need to continue
even touching the system on install? It is highly annoying for those of
us that maintain several installs of py
On 31 May 2015 at 19:07, Ludovic Gasc wrote:
> About Python 3 migration, I think that one of our best control stick is
> newcomers, and by extension, Python trainers/teachers.
> If newcomers learn first Python 3, when they will start to work
> professionally, they should help to rationalize the Py
Hi Yury,
I'm just starting my exploration into using async/await; all my
'real-world' scenarios are currently hypothetical.
One such hypothetical scenario however is that if I have a server
process running, with some set of concurrent connections, each managed
by a co-routine. Each co-routine is
2015-05-31 0:26 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan :
>
> On 31 May 2015 04:20, "Ludovic Gasc" wrote:
> >
> > For now, I'm following the mailing-lists from a spy-glass: I don't read
> most of the e-mails.
> > However, this thread seems to be "infected": I can smell from here your
> emotions behind your words.
A better course of action would be to deprecate the non-portable
version. Other than setting the PATH envvar, why do we need to continue
even touching the system on install? It is highly annoying for those of
us that maintain several installs of python on a single windows system,
and it reall
On 31 May 2015 at 11:41, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 31 May 2015 at 10:14, Xavier Combelle wrote:
>>> +1. The new embeddable Python distribution for Windows is a great step
>>> forward for this. It's not single-file, but it's easy to produce a
>>> single-directory self-contained application with it. I
On 31 May 2015 at 10:14, Xavier Combelle wrote:
>> +1. The new embeddable Python distribution for Windows is a great step
>> forward for this. It's not single-file, but it's easy to produce a
>> single-directory self-contained application with it. I don't know if
>> there's anything equivalent for
> +1. The new embeddable Python distribution for Windows is a great step
> forward for this. It's not single-file, but it's easy to produce a
> single-directory self-contained application with it. I don't know if
> there's anything equivalent for Linux/OSX - maybe it's something we
> should look at
16 matches
Mail list logo
