On 8 August 2015 at 02:12, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>> On Aug 7, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please don't add extra pain for purity and
>>> make sure that ensurepip installs "pip" and
>>> not "slow pip until you install wheel in the venv".
>>
>>
>> This is a rea
Following a long discussion on python-ideas, I've posted my draft of
PEP-498. It describes the "f-string" approach that was the subject of
the "Briefer string format" thread. I'm open to a better title than
"Literal String Formatting".
I need to add some text to the discussion section, but I think
> On Aug 7, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
> wrote:
>
>> Please don't add extra pain for purity and
>> make sure that ensurepip installs "pip" and
>> not "slow pip until you install wheel in the venv".
>
>
> This is a really good point -- other than purity, what is the downsid
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2015-07-31 - 2015-08-07)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open4992 (+31)
closed 31595 (+32)
total 36587 (+63)
Open issues wit
>Please don't add extra pain for purity and
>make sure that ensurepip installs "pip" and
>not "slow pip until you install wheel in the venv".
This is a really good point -- other than purity, what is the downside?
Arguably, the only reason setuptools, pip, and wheel are not in the
standard libra
> I'm confident we're
> going to want a "support prebuilt wheels only" installation option
> downstream in the Linux distro world -
Interesting-- so move to a Python specific binary distribution option
-- rather than using rm or deb packages?
Doesn't lead to a dependency heck? I.e no way to expre
Le 7 août 2015 00:51, "Robert Collins" a écrit :
> So - I was in a talk at PyCon AU about conda[*], and the author
> believed they were using the latest pip with all the latest caching
> features, but their experience (16 minute installs) wasn't that.
If an expert user is unaware of having to exp
On 7 August 2015 at 17:20, Donald Stufft wrote:
> I’m not sure if —no-build-tools make sense, since I plan on removing
> setuptools from ensurepip completely once pip can implicitly install it. PEP
> 453 explicitly called out the fact that setuptools was installed as an
> implementation detail
> On Aug 7, 2015, at 3:02 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> On 7 August 2015 at 08:50, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Certainly the framing of ensurepip as 'this installs pip' is going to
>> be confusing and misleading if it doesn't install pip the way
>> get-pip.py (or virtualenv) install pip, leading to
On 7 August 2015 at 08:50, Robert Collins wrote:
> Certainly the framing of ensurepip as 'this installs pip' is going to
> be confusing and misleading if it doesn't install pip the way
> get-pip.py (or virtualenv) install pip, leading to confusion such as
> that.
>
> Given the inconsequential impa
10 matches
Mail list logo
