At the request of the platform experts, 3.5.1 is now scheduled to happen
simultaneously with 2.7.11. That means:
Saturday November 21, 2015
tag 3.5.1rc1
Sunday November 22, 2015
release 3.5.1rc1
Saturday December 5, 2015
tag 3.5.1 final
Sunday December 6, 2015
release 3.5.1
> I'm not suggesting restarting at the top (I've elsewhere suggested that
> many such methods would be better as an *iterable* that can be restarted
> at the top by calling iter() multiple times, but that's not the same
> thing). I'm suggesting raising an exception other than StopIteration, so
> th
2015-11-04 21:14 GMT+01:00 Sven R. Kunze :
> Do you think there will be any change of merging this back into CPython?
If I understood correctly the first feedback on python-ideas, there
were mostly positive, so I believe that it would be possible to merge
the FAT mode into CPython. The changes req
On 11/4/2015 3:50 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement optimizations
in CPython (inlining, constant folding, move invariants out of loops,
etc.) using a "static" optimizer (not a JIT). For the background, see
the thread on python-ideas:
https:/
typo: "chance" instead of "change"
On 04.11.2015 21:14, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
Hi Victor,
great to hear. I think everybody here appreciates your efforts.
Do you think there will be any change of merging this back into CPython?
Best,
Sven
On 04.11.2015 09:50, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I'm wri
Hi Victor,
great to hear. I think everybody here appreciates your efforts.
Do you think there will be any change of merging this back into CPython?
Best,
Sven
On 04.11.2015 09:50, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement
optimizations in CPython (
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 09:50:33AM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement optimizations in
> CPython (inlining, constant folding, move invariants out of loops, etc.)
> using a "static" optimizer (not a JIT). For the background, see the thr
Uh, sorry, misread your full mail, scratch that
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> How do you check that someone did not e.g. bind something different to "len"?
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm writing a new "FAT Python" proje
How do you check that someone did not e.g. bind something different to "len"?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement optimizations in
> CPython (inlining, constant folding, move invariants out of loops, etc.)
> us
Hi,
I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement optimizations in
CPython (inlining, constant folding, move invariants out of loops, etc.)
using a "static" optimizer (not a JIT). For the background, see the thread
on python-ideas:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2015-O
10 matches
Mail list logo