On 12 February 2016 at 00:16, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I think that there is broad agreement that:
>
> - the basic idea is sound
> - leading underscores followed by digits are currently legal
> identifiers and this will not change
> - underscores should not follow the sign
Sorry to bringing this up again. I was hoping we were done with that.
When discussing the name of the Py_SETREF macro I was supposed to add a
pair of macros: for Py_DECREF and Py_XDECREF. But I got a lot of
opinions to be limited to only one macro.
On 28.02.14 15:58, Kristján Valur Jónsson
On 2016-02-12 04:15, Tim Peters wrote:
[Greg Ewing ]
The Mersenne Twister is no longer regarded as quite state-of-the art
because it can get into states that produce long sequences that are
not very random.
There is a variation on MT called WELL that has better
On 12 February 2016 at 19:45, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Now Raymond, who was not involved in the previous discussions, expressed the
> view that we should to rename Py_SETREF to Py_XSETREF and add new Py_SETREF
> that uses Py_DECREF for using in the code that used Py_DECREF
ping?
2016-02-08 15:18 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner :
> 2016-02-04 15:05 GMT+01:00 M.-A. Lemburg :
>> Sometimes, yes, but we also do allocations for e.g.
>> parsing values in Python argument tuples (e.g. using
>> "es" or "et"):
>>
>>
On 12.02.16 15:43, Georg Brandl wrote:
On 02/12/2016 10:45 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Sorry to bringing this up again. I was hoping we were done with that.
When discussing the name of the Py_SETREF macro I was supposed to add a
pair of macros: for Py_DECREF and Py_XDECREF. But I got a lot of
Hi,
2016-02-12 14:31 GMT+01:00 M.-A. Lemburg :
> Sorry, your email must gotten lost in my inbox.
no problemo
> Yes, but those are part of the stdlib. You'd need to check
> a few C extensions which are not tested as part of the stdlib,
> e.g. numpy, scipy, lxml, pillow, etc.
On 02/12/2016 10:45 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Sorry to bringing this up again. I was hoping we were done with that.
>
> When discussing the name of the Py_SETREF macro I was supposed to add a
> pair of macros: for Py_DECREF and Py_XDECREF. But I got a lot of
> opinions to be limited to only
On 12.02.2016 12:18, Victor Stinner wrote:
> ping?
Sorry, your email must gotten lost in my inbox.
> 2016-02-08 15:18 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner :
>> 2016-02-04 15:05 GMT+01:00 M.-A. Lemburg :
>>> Sometimes, yes, but we also do allocations for e.g.
>>>
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2016-02-05 - 2016-02-12)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open5417 ( +4)
closed 32691 (+50)
total 38108 (+54)
Open issues
Hello,
MicroPython is a lean and efficient Python implementation for
microcontrollers, embedded, and mobile systems (which also runs just as
fine on desktops, servers, and clouds).
https://github.com/micropython/micropython
https://github.com/micropython/micropython/releases/tag/v1.6
There're
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> I have no opinion on anything other than that whatever syntax is
> implemented as long as it allows single underscores between digits,
> such as
>
> 1_000_000
>
> Everything else is irrelevant to me, and if I read code
On Feb 12, 2016, at 12:58, Glenn Linderman wrote:
>
>> On 2/12/2016 12:06 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> As for the SS# example -- it seems a bad idea to me to store a SS# number as
>> an integer anyway -- so all the weird IDs etc. formats aren't really
>> relevant...
>
>
On 12 February 2016 at 20:06, Chris Barker wrote:
> As Paul said, as long as I can do the above, I'll be fine, but I think
> everyone's source code will be a lot cleaner in the long run if you don't
> have the option of doing who knows what weird arrangement
Just to be
On 2/12/2016 12:06 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Paul Moore > wrote:
I have no opinion on anything other than that whatever syntax is
implemented as long as it allows single underscores between digits,
On 2016-02-12 20:06, Chris Barker wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Paul Moore > wrote:
I have no opinion on anything other than that whatever syntax is
implemented as long as it allows single underscores between digits,
such
16 matches
Mail list logo