Le 22 oct. 2017 17:06, "Wes Turner" a écrit :
Must they always use their own implementations of time., datetime.
__init__, fromordinal, fromtimestamp ?!
Yes, exactly.
Note: Adding resolution better than 1 us to datetime is not in the scope of
the PEP but there is an issue, open since a long ti
On Sunday, October 22, 2017, David Mertz wrote:
> I worked at a molecular dynamics lab for a number of years. I advocated
> switching all our code to using attosecond units (rather than fractional
> picoseconds).
>
> However, this had nothing whatsoever to do with the machine clock speeds,
> but
I worked at a molecular dynamics lab for a number of years. I advocated
switching all our code to using attosecond units (rather than fractional
picoseconds).
However, this had nothing whatsoever to do with the machine clock speeds,
but only with the physical quantities represented and the scaling
On 23 October 2017 at 01:06, Wes Turner wrote:
> On Saturday, October 21, 2017, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> So yeah, for nanosecond resolution to not be good enough for programs
>> running in Python, we're going to be talking about some genuinely
>> fundamental changes in the nature of computing ha
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Wes Turner wrote:
> What about bus latency (and variance)?
I'm currently in Los Angeles. Bus latency is measured in minutes, and
may easily exceed sixty of them. :|
Seriously though: For applications requiring accurate representation
of relativistic effects, the
On Saturday, October 21, 2017, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 22 October 2017 at 09:32, Victor Stinner > wrote:
>
>> Le 21 oct. 2017 20:31, "francismb" > > a écrit :
>>
>> I understand that one can just multiply/divide the nanoseconds returned,
>> (or it could be a factory) but wouldn't it help for fu
Hi Victor,
I made some small fixes to the PEP.
As far as I'm concerned, the PEP is ok and should be approved :-)
Regards
Antoine.
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:42:30 +0200
Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While discussions on this PEP are not over on python-ideas, I proposed
> this PEP directly on
