Re: [Python-Dev] Migrate python-dev to Mailman 3?

2017-11-01 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
Starting with core-mentorship and then core-workflow sounds good. Let me first find out what it's going to take to do the migration. (I actually have no idea!) I've sent an email to postmaster and asked for more details :) Hope it's not too complicated... Mariatta Wijaya

Re: [Python-Dev] Migrate python-dev to Mailman 3?

2017-11-01 Thread Guido van Rossum
Another one is core-mentorship, which satisfies the same criteria; and in my view this has the added and useful property that its beneficiaries are non-core members. After that I'd do core-workflow. Honestly I'd leave python-committers alone for a while, we're a curmudgeonly group. :-) On Wed, Nov

Re: [Python-Dev] Migrate python-dev to Mailman 3?

2017-11-01 Thread Lukasz Langa
+1 committers > On Nov 1, 2017, at 7:54 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2017, at 19:42, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> >> Maybe we should try it on some other list too? I know it works "in >> principle" and I'd love for all Python mailing lists to migrate, but I'd >> like to have some more

Re: [Python-Dev] Migrate python-dev to Mailman 3?

2017-11-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 1, 2017, at 19:42, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Maybe we should try it on some other list too? I know it works "in principle" > and I'd love for all Python mailing lists to migrate, but I'd like to have > some more experience with community mailing lists before tackling python-dev. What

Re: [Python-Dev] Migrate python-dev to Mailman 3?

2017-11-01 Thread Guido van Rossum
Maybe we should try it on some other list too? I know it works "in principle" and I'd love for all Python mailing lists to migrate, but I'd like to have some more experience with community mailing lists before tackling python-dev. On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Nov 1, 2

Re: [Python-Dev] Migrate python-dev to Mailman 3?

2017-11-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 1, 2017, at 18:49, Mariatta Wijaya wrote: > > Anything I can do to help make the migration to MM3 + HyperKitty happen? :) Thanks for the offer Mariatta! Assuming this is something we want to go through with, probably the best way to get there is to work with the postmaster, especially

Re: [Python-Dev] [edk2] Official port of Python on EDK2

2017-11-01 Thread Richardson, Brian
Thiebaud: Thank you. I have started discussions within Intel for updating the UEFI CPython implementation to Python 3.x. The TianoCore community would appreciate contributions by people with Python experience to bring this code up to current standards. Please review the contribution guidelines

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 511 (code transformers) rejected

2017-11-01 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 2 November 2017 at 09:16, Lukasz Langa wrote: > I find this sad. In the JavaScript community the existence of Babel is > very important for the long-term evolution of the language independently > from the runtime. With Babel, JavaScript programmers can utilize new > language syntax while being

Re: [Python-Dev] Migrate python-dev to Mailman 3?

2017-11-01 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
Anything I can do to help make the migration to MM3 + HyperKitty happen? :) Mariatta Wijaya ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python

Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Reminder: 12 weeks to 3.7 feature code cutoff

2017-11-01 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 2 November 2017 at 07:47, Ned Deily wrote: > Happy belated Halloween to those who celebrate it; I hope it wasn't too > scary! Also possibly scary: we have just a little over 12 weeks remaining > until Python 3.7's feature code cutoff, 2018-01-29. Those 12 weeks include > a number of traditio

Re: [Python-Dev] Migrate python-dev to Mailman 3?

2017-11-01 Thread Lukasz Langa
> On Oct 30, 2017, at 4:00 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > > Except of Antoine Pitrou, does everybody else like the new UI? :-) I also much prefer MM3 and HyperKitty. The old pipermail tree looks more inviting (I like the concise tree) but it's deceiving. When you actually start going through an

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 530

2017-11-01 Thread Lukasz Langa
The original poster is an elementary school student. To keep the list clean, I responded 1:1 in a more inviting manner. Hopefully the person will succeed installing and learning Python :-) - Ł > On Oct 28, 2017, at 2:33 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > > On 10/27/2017 4:43 PM, London wrote: >> can yo

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 511 (code transformers) rejected

2017-11-01 Thread Lukasz Langa
I find this sad. In the JavaScript community the existence of Babel is very important for the long-term evolution of the language independently from the runtime. With Babel, JavaScript programmers can utilize new language syntax while being able to deploy on dated browsers. While there's always

[Python-Dev] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations

2017-11-01 Thread Lukasz Langa
Based on positive feedback on python-ideas back in September, I'm publishing the second draft for consideration on python-dev. I hope you like it! A nicely formatted rendering is available here: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0563/ (Just make sure you're looking at the version that has "Post

[Python-Dev] Reminder: 12 weeks to 3.7 feature code cutoff

2017-11-01 Thread Ned Deily
Happy belated Halloween to those who celebrate it; I hope it wasn't too scary! Also possibly scary: we have just a little over 12 weeks remaining until Python 3.7's feature code cutoff, 2018-01-29. Those 12 weeks include a number of traditional holidays around the world so, if you are planning

Re: [Python-Dev] [edk2] Official port of Python on EDK2

2017-11-01 Thread Brett Cannon
The official guidelines on what it takes to add official support for a platform is https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0011/#supporting-platforms. Basically it's a core dev willing to sponsor and maintain the work, a buildbot, and implicitly at least a 5 year commitment. On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 at 05:5

[Python-Dev] Review for bpo-30140: fix binop dispatch for subclasses

2017-11-01 Thread Stephan Hoyer
Hi python-dev, It's been over a month without any activity and over a week since my ping, and I'm still waiting for a review on my pull request: https://bugs.python.org/issue30140 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/1325 I would greatly appreciate if someone has time to take a look. This is my

[Python-Dev] Official port of Python on EDK2

2017-11-01 Thread Thiebaud Weksteen via Python-Dev
Hi, UEFI has become the standard for firmware (BIOS) interface. Intel has provided an open source implementation under the name EDK2 (part of the TianoCore initiative) [1] for some time. This implementation has evolved significantly and now provides the functionalities of a small OS with a standar

Re: [Python-Dev] [edk2] Official port of Python on EDK2

2017-11-01 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:46:27 +0100 Christian Heimes wrote: > > > This work would target the master branch (that is Python 3). I would > > be interested in hearing your thoughts on this idea. > > In general your proposal sounds like a good idea. A new platform may > require a PEP, though. It wo

Re: [Python-Dev] [edk2] Official port of Python on EDK2

2017-11-01 Thread Christian Heimes
On 2017-11-01 10:07, Thiebaud Weksteen wrote: > Hi, > > UEFI has become the standard for firmware (BIOS) interface. Intel has > provided an open source implementation under the name EDK2 (part of > the TianoCore initiative) [1] for some time. This implementation has > evolved significantly and now