14.11.17 22:34, Ivan Levkivskyi пише:
This function will be called only if ``name`` is not found in the module
through the normal attribute lookup.
It is worth to mention that using name as a module global will bypass
__getattr__. And this is intentional, otherwise calling __getattr__ for
On 15 November 2017 at 06:26, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> After some discussion on python-ideas, see https://mail.python.org/
> pipermail/python-ideas/2017-September/047220.html, this PEP received
> positive comments. The updated version that takes into account the comments
>
On Nov 7, 2017 08:12, "INADA Naoki" wrote:
Additionally, class namespace should keep insertion order. It's language
spec from 3.6. So we should have two mode for such optimization.
It makes dict more complicated.
FWIW, PEP 520 (Preserving Class Attribute Definition
Hi Antoine,
On 8 November 2017 at 10:28, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Yet, PyPy has no reference counting, and it doesn't seem to be a cause
> of concern. Broken code is fixed along the way, when people notice.
It is a major cause of concern. This is the main blocker for
After discussion on python-ideas, it looks this PEP moves towards a
favorable decision. For a recent discussion see
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-November/047806.html.
The PEP is available at https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0562/
The most important recent change is the
After some discussion on python-ideas, see
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-September/047220.html,
this PEP received positive comments. The updated version that takes into
account the comments that appeared in the discussion so far is available at
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> If the Python REPL is included in the "run an application" use case,
> the frontier between user and developer becomes blurry :-) Is REPL
> designed for users or developers? Should Python guess the intent of
>
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 13:15 +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:55:03 -0500
> Stephen Michell wrote:
> > I am looking for one or two experts to discuss with me how Python
> > concurrency features fit together, and possible vulnerabilities
> >
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:55:03 -0500
Stephen Michell wrote:
> I am looking for one or two experts to discuss with me how Python concurrency
> features fit together, and possible vulnerabilities associated with that.
>
> TR 24772 lists 5 vulnerabilities
A note was added [1] about the solution for module only distributions and
is live on Python.org.
[1] https://github.com/python/peps/pull/468
Ethan Smith
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Sebastian Rittau
wrote:
> Am 14.11.2017 um 02:38 schrieb Guido van Rossum:
>
> On Mon,
Am 14.11.2017 um 02:38 schrieb Guido van Rossum:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Sebastian Rittau > wrote:
I am really looking forward to the implementation of this PEP and
I am glad that it is close to acceptance. One thing that is not
11 matches
Mail list logo