In the PR I've submitted, that's essentially what I'm doing for the default
Real.is_integer() implementation. The details differ slightly, in that I
rely on the int() constructor to call __trunc__(), rather than introduce a
new dependency on the math module.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 at 21:29, Chris Bar
I know this is all done, but for completeness’ sake:
I just noticed math.trunc() and __trunc__().
So wouldn’t the “correct” way to check for an integral value be something
like:
obj.__trunc__() == obj
I don’t think this has any bearing on adding is_integer() methods to
numeric objects, but migh
On 27 March 2018 at 01:17, Eric V. Smith wrote:
> On 3/26/18 11:10 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
>>
>> On 3/26/18 11:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27 March 2018 at 00:40, Eric V. Smith wrote:
>
>
>>> Would it be feasible to define `Field.__set_name__`, and have that
>>> call `default.__set_nam
