On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 04:18:37PM -0700, Ed Peschko wrote:
> all,
>
> I was debugging a very long script that I was not all that familiar
> with, and I was doing my familiar routine of being very careful in
> evaluating expressions to make sure that I didn't hit such statements
> as:
>
>
all,
I was debugging a very long script that I was not all that familiar
with, and I was doing my familiar routine of being very careful in
evaluating expressions to make sure that I didn't hit such statements
as:
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'str'
anyways the script
Hello Python Dev,
I posted the following to python-ideas but here may be
a more suitable place. I apologize if cross posting
bothers anyone.
I have implemented an (I believe) PEP 543-conform TLS library
and released TLS support in the latest version yesterday:
As a piece of pure experiential data based on some years trying to herd the
PSF cats, if python-dev can find a way of running its activities without
votes needing to be taken I would really emphasise the benefits of the lack
of such administration.
If voting is required, please consider using the
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 13:20, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> What is the timeframe for the installation of the new governance? In
> other words, when will it be possible to review PEPs?
>
PEP 8001 outlines the voting for the governance models which includes a
planned schedule for that vote. After that
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2018-10-19 - 2018-10-26)
Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open6823 (-12)
closed 40005 (+62)
total 46828 (+50)
Open issues
Thanks for asking a question that triggered an enlightening discussion!
On 10/25/2018 5:13 PM, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After your feedback, I have my answer.
>
> I understand the your points of view and I don't want to change any part
> of code for os.system and subprocess, I don't
