Steve Holden writes:
> In which case, wouldn't "_" make a better literal prefix than "i"?
There's no reason to suppose that "i" would be drop-in compatible for
GNU gettext (for example, gettext purely deals with the message
catalog lookup, while i-strings might be able to deal with currency
form
On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 06:29, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> A million seems reasonable for lines of source code, if we're prepared
> to tell people using machine generated code to split their humongous .py
> files into multiple scripts. A small imposition on a small subset of
> Python users, for the b
In which case, wouldn't "_" make a better literal prefix than "i"?
A better comparison might be between _"..." and f"...".
regards
Steve Holden
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 5:37 AM Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 04.12.19 16:02, Anders Munch пише:
> > Victor Stinner [mailto:vstin...@python.org] wrote:
>
06.12.19 21:16, Kyle Stanley пише:
Would it be reasonable to require an minimum amount of versions to be
specified (such as n versions ahead), but provide flexibility in terms
to delaying the removal, as needed? IMO, it would be more convenient for
users to have a "minimum removal" version in m
