[Python-Dev] Re: VS Code extension for Python.asdl

How easy are extensions like this to make? We might want to have one for the PEG grammar (if it goes through). On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 6:44 PM Brett Cannon wrote: > https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=brettcannon.zephyr-asdl > > Basically syntax highlighting and automatic bracket

[Python-Dev] VS Code extension for Python.asdl

https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=brettcannon.zephyr-asdl Basically syntax highlighting and automatic bracket matching for those that ever have to work with Python.asdl. If the number of direct installs of this extension breaks into double digits I will be a bit shocked. ;) ___

[Python-Dev] Re: New discuss.python.org category: Core Dev

Kyle Stanley wrote: > Thanks for adding the new section, Brett. :) > Was the name "Core Development" also considered? Nope, no one suggested it. Feel free to hit up the thread under Discourse Feedback to see what others think. -Brett > To me, it seems like "Core > Dev" could be interpreted as a

[Python-Dev] Re: New discuss.python.org category: Core Dev

Thanks for adding the new section, Brett. :) Was the name "Core Development" also considered? To me, it seems like "Core Dev" could be interpreted as abbreviating "Core Developer", which seems roughly equivalent to the existing "Committers" category (at least based on the name alone). I'm sure tha

[Python-Dev] New discuss.python.org category: Core Dev

I just created https://discuss.python.org/c/core-dev/ to somewhat mirror this mailing list as people were asking for an equivalent space on discuss.python.org due to the Users category now being heavily used for user questions (which makes sense based on the title 😄). I also moved the SC Nomina

[Python-Dev] Re: How to respond to repeated bad ideas

On Tue., 3 Mar. 2020, 2:11 pm Kyle Stanley, wrote: > > In most cases of a first-time poster that I've seen, the poster probably > doesn't have the understanding needed to conduct a proper search of the > mailing list. That's why I suggest responding with some genuine help (i.e. > taking their ide

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 614 accepted

Le mar. 3 mars 2020 à 20:30, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer a écrit : > Just for learning purposes, why was this improvement not included at the > beginning? (I missed the original thread) It's explained in the second paragraph of the PEP: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0614/#motivation Victor -

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 614 accepted

On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 19:31, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote: > > Just for learning purposes, why was this improvement not included at the > beginning? (I missed the original thread) Mostly just a matter of caution. It's a lot easier to relax the restrictions later than it is to add restrictions

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 614 accepted

Congratulations Brandt! On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 9:19 PM Barry Warsaw wrote: > By unanimous consent, the Python Steering Council unanimously accepts PEP > 614 — > Relaxing Grammar Restrictions On Decorators. > > Congratulations to PEP author Brandt and PEP sponsor Guido, and thanks to > everyone who

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 614 accepted

Just for learning purposes, why was this improvement not included at the beginning? (I missed the original thread) Yours, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer pythonmembers.club | github Mauritius > ___

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 614 accepted

On 03/03/2020 10:13 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: Congratulations to PEP author Brandt and PEP sponsor Guido, and thanks to everyone who’s worked on this PEP and its implementation. Congratulations!! -- ~Ethan~ ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@p

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 614 accepted

Thanks to Guido for sponsoring, and to the SC for their acceptance! Brandt ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Mess

[Python-Dev] Re: How to respond to repeated bad ideas

On 3/3/2020 2:18 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: 03.03.20 01:03, Skip Montanaro пише: Atm we don't have an index of ideas, apart from pep 3099, and I'm not sure we can make one (can we?), so I do not see a way to prevent this from happening. Maybe an informational PEP which briefly lists rejected

[Python-Dev] PEP 614 accepted

By unanimous consent, the Python Steering Council unanimously accepts PEP 614 — Relaxing Grammar Restrictions On Decorators. Congratulations to PEP author Brandt and PEP sponsor Guido, and thanks to everyone who’s worked on this PEP and its implementation. Cheers, -Barry signature.asc Descrip

[Python-Dev] Re: How to respond to repeated bad ideas

On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 07:27, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > 03.03.20 01:03, Skip Montanaro пише: > >> Atm we don't have an index of ideas, apart from pep 3099, and I'm not > sure we can make one (can we?), so I do not see a way to prevent this from > happening. > > > > Maybe an informational PEP which

[Python-Dev] Re: How to respond to repeated bad ideas

The webmaster list sends an auto-response to new posters. If something like that could happen on python-dev too, as long as the advice was clear enough the list could then simply ignore such requests, knowing that the auto-responder had taken care of it. This could drive posters to python-list or p