On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 01:57, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> I don’t see how the stable ABI works as a substitute for vendoring Python. A
> lot of other things can still vary even when the C API remains the same!
> (E.g. syntax, and stdlib behavior.)
IMO it doesn't. However for certain application
I don’t see how the stable ABI works as a substitute for vendoring Python.
A lot of other things can still vary even when the C API remains the same!
(E.g. syntax, and stdlib behavior.)
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:49 Steve Dower wrote:
> On 6/9/2021 2:20 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > On 09. 06. 21
Summer is almost here (at least in half of the planet) and Python 3.10 is
finishing baking in the oven. For those of you that want to taste it before
is finally ready (and if you are a library developer, you certainly do!)
you can have the second-to-last beta now, but be careful as is still very
ho
On 6/9/2021 2:20 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09. 06. 21 13:09, Paul Moore wrote:
Also, I often use the stable ABI when embedding, so that
I can replace the Python interpreter without needing to recompile my
application and redeploy new binaries everywhere (my use case is
pretty niche, though, so