[Python-Dev] Re: Switching to Discourse

One thing I’ve noticed and found disappointing with discourse is that it seems to lose the markdown formatting in both emails and quoting in replies. It really effects the readability, partly when there’s code that loses its formatting :-( I don’t know that that affects this discussion-/ but

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 563 and Python 3.10.

What about the known CVEs for Python 3.10?? I have been running a website (https://mehndidesign.io/) on a self hosted Ubuntu running on WordOps which uses Python 3.10. Is there any security hole which I should be worried about? Thanks. ___ Python-Dev

[Python-Dev] Re: Switching to Discourse

Hi Brett, I understand your points. I think the main point of difference is the gap in usability between GitHub discussions and Discourse - I think it's massive, but I understand others will be less enamoured by GitHub and less frustrated by Discourse than me. One correction: but that does make

[Python-Dev] Re: Switching to Discourse

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 3:45 AM Samuel Colvin wrote: > Reading this thread and thinking about discuss.python.org/Discourse - I'm > surprised no one is advocating github discussions > . > I think it's because discuss.python.org is what we decided to try

[Python-Dev] Re: Switching to Discourse

Reading this thread and thinking about discuss.python.org/Discourse - I'm surprised no one is advocating github discussions . In particular organisation discussions would provide an

[Python-Dev] Re: Switching to Discourse

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 07:06:47PM -0400, Edwin Zimmerman wrote: > Mailing list mode is not what you want.  Instead, turn mailing list mode off > and set your email settings to these: > > > > You can adjust the categories you receive email notifications for by changing > your list of watched

[Python-Dev] Re: Switching to Discourse

Terry Reedy writes: > On 7/21/2022 8:46 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > > Does anyone else find it very odd to call a communication system “discord”? > For games, most of which involve combat, it seems appropriate. For > CPython development, 'harmony' might be better. Already taken by the