There is a google code support project where google code issues are tracked.
http://code.google.com/p/support/
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a good question. I'll find out.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jack Howarth wrote:
Guido,
You'll never win that argument with the gcc developers. If you
rely on undefined behavior in the c language standard, they have
in the past, and will continue to, feel free to ignore those cases.
If you plan on ignoring this issue, just be prepared to see a
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 20:43 +0100, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
The C files are checked into subversion. Perhaps there is some
problem with the timestamps that causes the Makefile to try to rebuild
them anyway? I have a modern Python and I've been doing a fair amount
of
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 19:08 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin The natural question then is: what operating system, what
Martin subversion version are you using?
Sorry, wasn't thinking in terms of svn bugs. I was anticipating some sort
of obvious pilot error. I am on Mac OSX
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 12:27 -0400, Nicholas Bastin wrote:
On 8/8/05, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas Bastin wrote:
It's a mature product. I would hope that that would count for
something.
Sure. But so is subversion.
I will then assume that you and I have
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 11:12 -0600, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
It depends on what a bit is. Waiting a month would be fine; waiting
two years might be pointless.
It looks like the process of converting a CVS repository to
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 11:13 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Here's another POV. (Why does evereybody keep emailing me personally?)
Because we love you, and I forgot to cc python-dev.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 23:58 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Here's another POV.
I think I agree with Daniel's view, in particular wrt. to performance.
Whatever the replacement tool, it should perform as well or better
than CVS currently does; it also shouldn't perform
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 00:15 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Daniel Berlin wrote:
I'm not sure how big python's repo is, but you probably want to use the
attached patch to speed up cvs2svn. It changes it to reconstruct the
revisions on it's own instead of calling cvs or rcs.
Thanks
