I think what Christopher says is fair. My question (with little understanding
of the underlying infrastructure) is can we define a 'type' that communicates
that? Something like 'object that implements .read', or '.upper and .__iter__
for a spring-like object's?
toonarmycaptain
O
Add my name.
From: python-dev-requ...@python.org
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2020 11:00 AM
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Python-Dev Digest, Vol 205, Issue 17
Send Python-Dev mailing list submissions to
python-dev@python.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe
While editing the message to just state facts (clarifying the wording) an=
d omit specuilations, it will still serve its purpose -- while=20
stating the actual, valid, endorsed by the team (since the concensus is t=
hat the change itself was useful and should not be reverted but=20
could be impro
No contention to the contrary, but as a routine, post-merge git history
rewrite, not a grand plan, from what I understand.
Oh the other hand, an 'official' comment on the commit, recognising the issue
with the original commit message, the following discussion, and any conclusions
that get reach
Surely, if the argument is to be as inclusive and easy as possible, British
English should be used? Things may have changed, but my impression is that the
majority of English-second-language (ESL) speakers learn British English, not
American. So maybe that should be the switch, if inclusivity an
