Re: [Python-Dev] rationale for the no-new-features approach

2005-03-16 Thread Gregory P. Smith
[Gregory P. Smith] or make it even uglier to hide from pychecker by writing that as: exec( try: set except NameError: from sets import Set as set ) I presume that was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but if it wasn't, please reconsider. Modulefinder isn't able to realise

Re: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

2005-02-18 Thread Gregory P. Smith
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:06:24AM +0100, Martin v. L?wis wrote: Donovan Baarda wrote: This patch keeps the current md5c.c, md5module.c files and adds the following; _hashopenssl.c, hashes.py, md5.py, sha.py. [...] If all we wanted to do was fix the md5 module If we want to fix the

Re: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

2005-02-16 Thread Gregory P. Smith
fyi - i've updated the python sha1/md5 openssl patch. it now replaces the entire sha and md5 modules with a generic hashes module that gives access to all of the hash algorithms supported by OpenSSL (including appropriate legacy interface wrappers and falling back to the old code when compiled

[Python-Dev] Re: OpenSSL sha module / license issues with md5.h/md5c.c

2005-02-13 Thread Gregory P. Smith
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:02:23AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 17:35 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: I've created an OpenSSL version of the sha module. trivial to modify to be a md5 module. Its a first version with cleanup to be done and such. being managed

Re: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

2005-02-12 Thread Gregory P. Smith
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:37:21AM -0500, A.M. Kuchling wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 01:54:27PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: Are there any potential problems with making the md5sum module availability optional in the same way as this? The md5 module has been a standard module for a long

Re: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

2005-02-11 Thread Gregory P. Smith
I think it would be cleaner and simpler to modify the existing md5module.c to use the openssl md5 layer API (this is just a search/replace to change the function names). The bigger problem is deciding what/how/whether to include the openssl md5 implementation sources so that win32 can use

<    2   3   4   5   6   7