On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:19:59 -0500
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 13:43, PJ Eby wrote:
> > Again, the goal is fast startup of command-line tools that only use a
> > small subset of the overall framework; doing disk access for lazy imports
> > goes against that goal.
> >
> Depends if
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>Le samedi 28 janvier 2012 à 10:46 -0800, Mike Meyer a écrit :
>> Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> >You will see people copying recipes found on the internet without
>> >knowing that they rely on unstable APIs.
>>
>> How. About doing them
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:36 -0500
>Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 2012, at 09:15 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> >So I do not support the __preview__ package. I think we're better
>off
>> >flagging experimental modules in the docs than in their name. For
>the
>> >sp
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 00:07:27 -0500
PJ Eby wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > A suite is marked
> > as a `transaction`, and then when an unlocked object is modified,
> > instead of indicating an error, a locked copy of it is created to be
> &g
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:06:33 + (UTC)
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Mike Meyer mired.org> writes:
>
> > Since the only reason they exist is so you can access your end of a
> > pipe, setting them to anything would seem to be a bug. I'd argue that
> > their existence is
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 21:25:37 + (UTC)
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> The subprocess.Popen constructor takes stdin, stdout and stderr keyword
> arguments which are supposed to represent the file handles of the child
> process.
> The object also has stdin, stdout and stderr attributes, which one would
>
PEP: XXX
Title: Interpreter support for concurrent programming
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Mike Meyer
Status: Draft
Type: Informational
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 11-Nov-2011
Post-History:
Abstract
The purpose of this PEP is to explore strategies for
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:49:37 +
Michael Foord wrote:
> These figures can't possibly be true. No-one is using Python 3 yet. ;-)
Since you brought it up. Is anyone paying people (or trying to hire
people) to write Python 3?
Thanks,
http://www.mired.org/
Independent
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 21:26:29 +0100
Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> Readable code, is it really an advantage?
> Of course it is.
Ok, you got that right.
> Forcing the programmer to write readable code, is that an advantage?
> No suspense, the answer is Of course not.
This is *not* an "Of course". Readable
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 09:02:35 +0100
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> a) The stdlib documentation should help users to choose the right
> tool right from the start.
> b) cElementTree should finally loose it's "special" status as a
> separate library and disappear as an accelerator module behind
> ElementTree
On Fri, 02 May 2008 00:03:24 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 11:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I like this, except one issue: I really don't like the .local
> >directory. I don't see any compelling reason why this needs to be
> >~/.local/lib/ -- IMO it should just be ~/lib/. There's no nee
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:55:04 +0100 Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (weird places these threads come up at, but now that it's here...)
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:44:32 -0800 Ned Deily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> In article
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:01:14 +1300 Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > Trying to install it from the repository is a PITA, because
> > it uses both the easyinstall and Pyrex
>
> It shouldn't depend on Pyrex as long as it's distrib
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:44:32 -0800 Ned Deily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:42:49 + (UTC) Medhat Gayed
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > l
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:42:49 + (UTC) Medhat Gayed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lxml is good but not written in python and difficult to install and didn't
> work
> on MacOS X.
lxml is built on top of libxml2/libxslt, which are bundled with most
Unix-like OS's (including Mac OS X), or available
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:32:03 -0500 "Leif Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Shaya Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) I am willing to type in the password, which is obvious to anyone who
> > can read a simple script. That just doesn't work for a program you w
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:53:48 -0500 Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: now
is
> In 50 years, our grandchildren will be writing code with brain
> implants and displays burned right into their retina, and they'll /
> still/ be subject to 79 characters. I laugh every time I think that
> the
17 matches
Mail list logo
