On 23 May 2013 22:02, Ronan Lamy wrote:
> 2013/5/23 Łukasz Langa
>> Last one wins. Just like with assigning names in a scope, defining methods
>> in a class or overriding them in a subclass.
>
> This is a serious annoyance, considering that there are several places where
> a large library can rea
On 7 November 2012 13:57, Ulrich Eckhardt
wrote:
> Am 31.10.2012 23:15, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
> I'll take a shot, since I was also bitten by this when trying to learn
> Python. The important point is that some code earlier or later in that
> function does an assignment, so this location should
> On Jun 2, 2012 6:21 AM, "r.david.murray" wrote:
>> + For example, ``'ab c\n\nde fg\rkl\r\n'.splitlines()`` returns
>> + ``['ab c', '', 'de fg', 'kl']``, while the same call with
>> ``splinelines(True)``
>> + returns ``['ab c\n', '\n, 'de fg\r', 'kl\r\n']``
Wouldn't that be better written
On 19 April 2012 02:20, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> (and here we see why reference-stealing APIs are a nuisance: because
>> you never know in advance whether a function will steal a reference or
>> not, and you have to read the docs for each an
On 30 March 2012 21:52, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Oh dear. I really want to say that 15 ms is good enough. Some possible
> exceptions I can think of:
>
> - Profiling. But this really wants to measure CPU time anyways, and it
> already uses a variety of hacks and heuristics to pick the best timer,
On 19 October 2011 00:18, Mark Hammond wrote:
> On 18/10/2011 8:59 PM, Sam Partington wrote:
...
>> I added shebangs to
>> all files as appropriate for devel/stable branch, and initially I
>> changed the python build targets from "python -utt build.py" to
>
On 18 October 2011 08:10, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>> Is very unexpected. And to do so silently, without warning will cause
>
> It's only unexpected if you don't read the PEP. From there:
>
> "The launcher may offer some conveniences for Python developers working
> interactively - for example, starting
On 17 October 2011 15:20, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Sam Partington gmail.com> writes:
>
>> That sounds like an explanation of why it hasn't been implemented
>> before, not an explanation of why it should continue that way.
>
> From a desire to keep the launcher as sim
On 17 October 2011 17:24, PJ Eby wrote:
> What about -S (no site.py) and -E (no environment)? These are needed for
> secure setuid scripts on *nix; I don't know how often they'd be used in
> practice on Windows. (Basically, they let you isolate a script's effective
> sys.path; there may be some
On 17 October 2011 13:23, Mark Hammond wrote:
> On 17/10/2011 9:10 PM, Sam Partington wrote:
>>
>> "Only the first command-line argument will be checked for a shebang line
>> and only if that argument does not start with a '-'."
>>
>> But
Hello all,
I was surprised to see that the excellent pylauncher doesn't do the
magic shebang processing if you give it any python command line
options. e.g. Given
#!/usr/bin/env python2.6
import sys
print(sys.executable)
C:\>py test.py
C:\Python26\python.exe
C:\>py -utt test.py
C:\Python27\pyth
11 matches
Mail list logo
