On Sunday, March 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:41, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
- Hide quoted message -
I would like to see us create version specific (i.e. python32.exe /
python32w.exe) binaries (or links if we drop support for
On 2010-12-01, at 11:02 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
http://onpython3yet.com/ might be helpful to you. It orders the projects on
PyPI with the most dependencies which are not yet ported to 3.x.
Note that there are a number of false positives, e.g., the first result --
NumPy, since people
On 2010-09-20, at 7:41 AM, Sébastien Sablé wrote:
Le 17/09/2010 15:05, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
Following on Martin's comments, you might also want to share things
with the ActiveState guys who, AFAIK, maintain an AIX version of Python
(but you have been the most active AIX user on the bug
On 2010-09-18, at 2:29 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
I'd like to expand [tl.eggdeps]
to analyse dependencies between any packages on PyPI but I can't
as long as dependency information is not available without actually
installing things. [...]
On 2010-09-18, at 2:29 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
I am
On 2010-09-17, at 4:04 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
I am not even understanding what's the benefit of doing this since an
egg_info directory is obtained at *build* time and can differ from a
machine to another, so it seems pretty useless for me to publish this.
I am in full agreement with Tarek
Nor did it break any of our ActivePython 2.7 (Python trunk) builds ... though I
had to hand-edit the patches to use 4 spaces now. Will this untabification
change be made to the `release2.6-maint` branch too?
-srid
On 2010-05-09, at 11:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
The
On 2010-04-22, at 10:55 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
-On [20100423 02:48], Sridhar Ratnakumar (sridh...@activestate.com) wrote:
Ok, I setup a cron job to maintain an internal mirror of the above
mentioned repositories in code.python.org. We'll do a hg pull -u
(equivalent to svn
I am seeing random 403 errors when cloning the mercurial repositories of Python.
$ hg clone http://code.python.org/hg/branches/release2.6-maint
destination directory: release2.6-maint
requesting all changes
abort: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
$ hg clone
was consuming all bandwidth, although we couldn't quite figure
out who (whenever I was looking, the traffic looked genuine). It turned
out that Sridhar himself contributed a good chunk of this traffic.
Background in private emails to Martin (below):
On 2010-04-22, at 5:42 PM, Sridhar Ratnakumar
I just verified with our ActivePython build that 2.6.4rc2 builds fine on Linux,
Windows, Mac, HP-UX, AIX and Solaris. 3.1.2rc1 builds fine except on AIX[1] and
HP-UX[2] but those issues existed in 3.1.1 too, I believe.
-srid
[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue6645
[2]
On 1/17/2010 2:09 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Distribute has
some utility code to handle zip/tar archives. So does PyPM. This is because
the `tarfile` and `zipfile` modules do not just work due to several
issues.
Seehttp://gist.github.com/279606
Take note of the following in the above
On 1/22/2010 2:44 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Sridhar Ratnakumar
sridh...@activestate.com wrote:
[..]
3) Patch Lib/tarfile.py to fix issue6196
I am hoping that (1) and (2) will get accepted. But not (3) - in which case,
should this go as a workarond
On 1/22/2010 3:19 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
[..]
How about having an extra argument that would fix the permission? (Fixing
the permission is only applicable for tarfile, not zipfile, hence even our
callable will become specific to tarfile).
shutil.unpack_archive(/tmp/foo.tgz, /tmp,
On 1/22/2010 4:38 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar
sridh...@activestate.com wrote:
[..]
Will this callable recieve TarInfo objects if the filetype is tarfile? What
would it receive otherwise? How can `_ensure_read_write_access` be
implemented
On 1/17/2010 12:09 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Brett Cannonbr...@python.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:51, Tarek Ziadéziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
Another module I would like to move away from Distutils is
archive_util. It contains helpers to build
On 1/12/2010 2:46 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
I presume the email below is about the Windows binary. Does the AMD64
release work on intel 64bit and can we make the wording clearer on the
download page?
The current description is Windows AMD64 binary.
FWIW, we simply use (64-bit, x64).
On 12/27/2009 4:15 PM, david.l...@preisshare.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Nick Coghlanncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
FYI we have introduced a range operator, so one may define a range of
versions.
This is useful for instance to write:
On 12/27/2009 5:21 PM, MRAB wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar
sridh...@activestate.com wrote:
[..]
Tarek,
I am a bit confused at the current proposal combined with the newly
introduced range operator.
Would Requires-Python: =2.5 include 2.5.4
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:52:57 -0700, Michael Foord
fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
I don't recall ever having wanted / needed to install multiple versions
of the same library - whilst I can appreciate that it *can* be a real
issue it has never been a problem for me.
Multiple versions is
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:35:18 -0700, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 07:27 PM 10/7/2009 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Having more competition will also help, e.g. ActiveState's PyPM looks
promising (provided they choose to open-source it) and then there's
pip.
Note that both PyPM and
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:06:47 -0700, Sridhar Ratnakumar
sridh...@activestate.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:44:14 -0700, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org
wrote:
2.6.3rc1 builds fine on Linux x86/x86_64, MacOSX 10.4 ppc/x86, Windows
32bit/64bit, HP-UX, AIX and Solaris just like 2.6.2 did
2.6.3rc1 builds fine on Linux x86/x86_64, MacOSX 10.4 ppc/x86, Windows
32bit/64bit, HP-UX, AIX and Solaris just like 2.6.2 did.
-srid
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:34:02 -0700, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Sep 30, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Ned Deily wrote:
In my opinion, the standard
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:44:14 -0700, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
2.6.3rc1 builds fine on Linux x86/x86_64, MacOSX 10.4 ppc/x86, Windows
32bit/64bit, HP-UX, AIX and Solaris just like 2.6.2 did.
Thanks for the feedback! Did you run the test suite on any of these?
I will run the tests
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:11:18 -0700, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Michael Foord
fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
Note that Activestate also have a fledgling package management system
for
Python (unreleased yet I *believe*) so it is probably worth
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:48:08 -0700, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
Since the language summit at PyCon 2009 various committers, including
me, have been encouraging Tarek to act as distutils dictator to get
things finished as we all know people are prone to bikeshedding that
would
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:55:54 -0700, Joe Amenta ament...@msu.edu wrote:
-- 3to2 is now registered with PyPI. Did I do it right?
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/3to2/0.1%20alpha%201
Please fix the version number to not contain any whitespace characters.
Also set the `version` argument in
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:11:38 -0700, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
Then why not include pip, easy_install, and this bash script I use to
install packages into core? The more the merrier, right?
Answer: None of these are standards, and as nick points out, there's
issues with sysadmins,
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:01:24 -0700, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
get_installed_files(local=False) - iterator of (path, md5, size)
Will this also return the directories /created/ during the installation?
For example, will it also contain the entry docutils .. along with
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:22:03 -0700, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
if docutils 0.5 is installed, Foo is broken, unless docutils 0.4 is
shipped with it.
As was stated by Debian packagers on the distutils ML, the problem is
that docutils 0.5 breaks packages which work with docutils
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:56:36 -0700, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing that did occur to me based on this - do we want the format to
support designation of files (such as config files) that *shouldn't* be
uninstalled along with everything else? Or are we happy with not
mentioning
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:22:19 -0700, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Sridhar
Ratnakumarsridh...@activestate.com wrote:
Other than easy_install/pip, there is also PyPM which is being
developed at
ActiveState. PyPM is the Python package manager much
Here are my comments regarding PEP 376 with respect to PyPM (the Python
package manager being developd at ActiveState)
Multiple versions: I understand that the PEP does not support
installation (thus uninstallation) of multiple versions of the same
package. Should this be explicitly mentioned
On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:46:58 -0700, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/5 P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com:
At 05:26 PM 7/5/2009 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
def get_distribution(name):
for d in get_distributions():
if d.name == name:
return d
return None
Btw,
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:22:52 -0700, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
If the only driver for this PEP is setuptools, then I'm -1 on it.
Unless someone working on a packaging tool *other* than setuptools (or
setuptools-derived projects) speaks up and says I have code of my own
which uses
Is there any reason why RECORD file can't be generated at runtime? Also,
why should the RECORD file be generated at all by bdist* commands?
A .deb file contains data.tar.gz that is simply extracted over /.
There is no need for RECORD inside a .deb file because it is implicit in
the
On 09-06-23 02:57 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Something like DistributionDirectoryMap should cover it.
You could probably get away with shortening Directory to Dir in the
class names though:
- Distribution
- ZippedDistribution
- DistributionDir
- ZippedDistributionDir
-
36 matches
Mail list logo