Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > I just downloaded Python 2.6.1, 3.0.1 and 3.1alpha1, compiled them on 32 and > 64 bits CPU, and ran pybench 2.1(*). > > Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: >  * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms >  * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms >  * Python 3.1a1: 9228 ms (

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Le Sunday 08 March 2009 13:20:34 Antoine Pitrou, vous avez écrit : > Hi, > > Victor Stinner haypocalc.com> writes: > > Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: > > * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms > > * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms > > * Python 3.1a1: 9228 ms (slower than 3.0) > > Have you compiled with or with

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Collin Winter
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Christian Heimes wrote: > Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Victor Stinner haypocalc.com> writes: >>> Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: >>>  * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms >>>  * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms >>>  * Python 3.1a1: 9228 ms (slower than 3.0) >> >> Have you co

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Christian Heimes cheimes.de> writes: > > Why is the feature still disabled by default? Marc-André expressed concerns that it might trigger compiler issues. > PS: Holy moly! Computed gotos totally put my Python on fire! The feature > increases the minimum run-time by approx. 25% and the average

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Christian Heimes
Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Hi, > > Victor Stinner haypocalc.com> writes: >> Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: >> * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms >> * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms >> * Python 3.1a1: 9228 ms (slower than 3.0) > > Have you compiled with or without "--with-computed-gotos"? Why is the featur

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hi, Victor Stinner haypocalc.com> writes: > > Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: > * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms > * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms > * Python 3.1a1: 9228 ms (slower than 3.0) Have you compiled with or without "--with-computed-gotos"? Regards Antoine. _

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, > So, 3.1 is 30% faster in user CPU time, even though it probably has more > tests (...) Wow! I just downloaded Python 2.6.1, 3.0.1 and 3.1alpha1, compiled them on 32 and 64 bits CPU, and ran pybench 2.1(*). Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms * Python 3.0.1:

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-07 Thread Hirokazu Yamamoto
Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hello, Out of curiosity, I timed running the test suite ("./python -m test.regrtest") in non-debug mode, in both the release30-maint and py3k branches: * release30-maint got: 302 tests OK. [...] 165.79user 26.03system 5:01.75elapsed 63%CPU * py3k got: 304 tests OK. [...]

[Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-07 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hello, Out of curiosity, I timed running the test suite ("./python -m test.regrtest") in non-debug mode, in both the release30-maint and py3k branches: * release30-maint got: 302 tests OK. [...] 165.79user 26.03system 5:01.75elapsed 63%CPU * py3k got: 304 tests OK. [...] 113.33user 28.93system 4