> > Ah, but that would require changes to the slaves, right? I would
> > prefer a solution that avoids that.
>
> I don't think so. In my little test setup I didn't have to make any
> change to the slave.
The "update" and "clobber" mode parameters are implemented on the slave side.
Trent's patch c
On Saturday 07 January 2006 10:01, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> The problem with irc-enabling (or web-enabling) such things is that
> there is a potential for abuse. Of course, in this case, we could
> wait for the abuse to happen.
That would be my vote. Worst comes to worst, we lock it down to a list
[Martin v. Loewis wrote]
> Trent Mick wrote:
> > I think I'm part of the way there with the following. I've subclassed
> > the "SVN" source build step to add support for new source mode:
> > "update_and_clobber_occassionally". Basically it (hackily) changes the
> > source type btwn "update", which
Trent Mick wrote:
> I think I'm part of the way there with the following. I've subclassed
> the "SVN" source build step to add support for new source mode:
> "update_and_clobber_occassionally". Basically it (hackily) changes the
> source type btwn "update", which we usually want, and "clobber", whi
> > To wipe out the build occassionally you could (presumably) add a
> > starting step to the Python 'builder' (in the build master.cfg) to
> > rm -rf $builddir
> > every, say, Sunday night.
>
> Sure, that would be the idea. How to formulate it?
I think I'm part of the way there with the fol
Anthony Baxter wrote:
> At least with the way Twisted is set up, the buildbot also sits in an
> IRC channel and sends updates there. It can also be controlled from
> there. Is this worth doing? A 'force clean build' command could be
> added...
The problem with irc-enabling (or web-enabling) suc
Trent Mick wrote:
> (Still learning my buildbot mojo.) One idea would be to do what
> Mozilla's Tinderbox does: they have one set of builds that are
> incremental and one set that are full. Actually looking around on
> tinderbox.mozilla.org I could only find incremental builds so I'm not
> sure wha
[Martin v. Loewis wrote]
> I would like to do this in buildbot, but I'm not sure how to
> (i.e. wipe the build occasionally, but not every time).
>
> For example, I could imagine completely cleaning the build directory
> every time the build number % 10 == 0. Still, what the precise
> buildbot inc
On Friday 06 January 2006 18:39, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I would like to do this in buildbot, but I'm not sure how to
> (i.e. wipe the build occasionally, but not every time).
>
> For example, I could imagine completely cleaning the build
> directory every time the build number % 10 == 0. Still, w
Tim Peters wrote:
>>Still, perhaps it's wise to wipe the checkout every so often?
>
>
> I think it is. And while I haven't seen this under MS VC7.1 yet, a
> few times I caught VC 6.0 failing to recompile after a relevant
> header file changed. Certainly from-scratch checkout + build should
> b
[John J Lee]
> Might a buildbot running this setup of David Munman's (free MS compiler +
> NAnt interpreting the MS project file) be useful?
>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/226584dd47047bb6/1e33ad19197bee20
No comment from me about that (don't know anything
Anthony Baxter wrote:
> My only concern is that it's gentoo, not just linux. I know that for a
> couple of my other open source projects I usually don't spend too
> long debugging bizarrely broken apparent bugs, because it ends up
> being some strange build flag or some such on the gentoo box in
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, John J Lee wrote:
> Might a buildbot running this setup of David Munman's (free MS compiler +
> NAnt interpreting the MS project file) be useful?
s/Munman/Murmann/
John
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.p
On Jan 5, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> On Friday 06 January 2006 07:44, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> With the gentoo installation, I think we have "enough" linux for
>> the moment. Somebody noticed that the Waterfall view of buildbot
>> quickly becomes unreadable if there are too many b
On Friday 06 January 2006 07:44, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> With the gentoo installation, I think we have "enough" linux for
> the moment. Somebody noticed that the Waterfall view of buildbot
> quickly becomes unreadable if there are too many builds.
My only concern is that it's gentoo, not just lin
John J Lee wrote:
> Might a buildbot running this setup of David Munman's (free MS compiler +
> NAnt interpreting the MS project file) be useful?
I feel that any contribution here takes quite some time initially, so
somebody making that offer should accept some pain until it really
works self-cont
Anthony Baxter wrote:
> FWIW, I have an older box running Ubuntu 05.10 that spends most of
> it's days pining for stuff to do (at the moment, it does DHCP and DNS
> for the house. Yes, I know I have too many damn computers here). I
> can set up a buildbot on it easily enough. It's something like
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Tim Peters wrote:
[...]
> A problem for Windows buildbot slaves is that they need an appropriate
> compiler. Does this machine have MS VC 7.1 installed? If not, it
> can't compile the code. The Windows Python would also like to build
> several other packages (like bz2 and Tcl
[Morel Xavier]
> I currently have a (quite weak) computer that mostly sits idle (shares
> the web connection), Tbird 750; 640Mb RAM; Windows Server 2003 Standard
> Edition.
>
> Since the computer sits there doing nothing, I could probably put a
> buildbot on it if needed (since the
FWIW, I have an older box running Ubuntu 05.10 that spends most of
it's days pining for stuff to do (at the moment, it does DHCP and DNS
for the house. Yes, I know I have too many damn computers here). I
can set up a buildbot on it easily enough. It's something like a
600MHz P3 or something. Is
Morel> but i'd like to know how often it'll try to build, and how long
Morel> the build itself may take on such a platform.
It should build every time there's a checkin on trunk or the 2.4 branch. As
for performance, take a look at
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/
to see how long
I currently have a (quite weak) computer that mostly sits idle (shares
the web connection), Tbird 750; 640Mb RAM; Windows Server 2003 Standard
Edition.
Since the computer sits there doing nothing, I could probably put a
buildbot on it if needed (since the python-dev thread state
22 matches
Mail list logo
