-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Heimes wrote:
| Oh yeah ... ZODB4 and BDBStorage ... a dark chapter starting with high
| hopes and ending in tragedy ... Several projects like Zope and
| Subversion worked hard on a a Berkeley DB backend but in the end all
| projects had the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guido van Rossum wrote:
| Correction: the subversion BerkeleyDB backend is still very much alive
| and kicking. There were some early issues (they did things that
| SleepyCat told them not to do :-) but it was corrected and it's still
| working fine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Heimes wrote:
| More than 5 years ago Zope Corp was working on a Berkeley DB backend for
| ZODB. It was more of a marketing decision to show large companies that
| ZODB is using a well known database instead of a self made one. The
| project
Fred Drake wrote:
The BDBStorage is long gone at this point. Few are so unfortunate as
to remember it (though a few who may just might be on this list). :-)
Oh yeah ... ZODB4 and BDBStorage ... a dark chapter starting with high
hopes and ending in tragedy ... Several projects like Zope and
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:00:54PM +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
Oh yeah ... ZODB4 and BDBStorage ... a dark chapter starting with high
hopes and ending in tragedy ... Several projects like Zope and
Subversion worked hard on a a Berkeley DB backend but in the end all
projects had the same
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Correction: the subversion BerkeleyDB backend is still very much alive
and kicking. There were some early issues (they did things that
SleepyCat told them not to do :-) but it was corrected and it's still
working fine for several large users.
Thanks for the correction!
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Correction: the subversion BerkeleyDB backend is still very much alive
and kicking. There were some early issues (they did things that
SleepyCat told them not to do :-) but it was
Guido van Rossum wrote:
This was the fault of the svn developers, not of BerkeleyDB. And svn
has fixed the issues.
I got that in your last mail ;)
Christian
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Correction: the subversion BerkeleyDB backend is still very much alive
and kicking. There were some early issues (they did things that
SleepyCat told them not to do :-) but it was corrected and it's still
working fine for several large users.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Christian Heimes
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
Sorry, can I ask an additional question? These words - what they were
about? about the architecture of BDBStorage and Subversion, or about the
very BerkeleyDB, or about what?
I don't know all details and it was several years ago so some of my
saying may not be correct.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:46:04PM -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
My opinion on bsddb as a standard library module is based mostly on its
always been there and a vague memory of the last time this came up I
thought people piped up saying they liked batteries being included,
including bsddb and
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, in my opinion batteries included is great, but not when one of
the batteries consistently acts up and requires a good shake to get
working again. The bsddb module has consistent reliability issues when
it comes
Neal Norwitz schrieb:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, in my opinion batteries included is great, but not when one of
the batteries consistently acts up and requires a good shake to get
working again. The bsddb module has consistent reliability
Maybe the flaky tests could be moved towards the end? This way we could
at least see if the other tests work.
It's intentional that the tests run in a random order.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Feb 27, 2008, at 9:13 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
Doing a code search finds a fair number of users of the module: Zope's
BDBStorage, ...
The BDBStorage is long gone at this point. Few are so unfortunate as
to remember it (though a few who may just might be on this list). :-)
-Fred
--
2008/2/25, Thomas Hervé [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've worked on that problem during the bug day. I've open a ticket with
a patch at http://bugs.python.org/issue2168.
Most of the buildbots are green now!!!
Thank you all! This community is as awesome as Python itself, ;)
Three remains in red,
- Alpha Tru64: test_smtplib.py is flaky, and _ssl.c is not compiled
correctly. Neil is hunting this, I think.
Last time we looked at the _ssl problem, the machine had an
out-of-date installation of OpenSSL. Don't know if that ever got
rectified; I just crossed that buildbot off my list :-).
- X86 XP-4: idem. For this two, how can be tried if the bsddb lib in
those windows is correctly installed?
They check out bsddb from subversion, see Tools/buildbot/external.
If you don't trust that they did so correctly, edit the script to
remove bsddb, check that in, wait for them to delete
2008/2/26, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
They check out bsddb from subversion, see Tools/buildbot/external.
If you don't trust that they did so correctly, edit the script to
remove bsddb, check that in, wait for them to delete it, then revert
the script, check in again, and see how
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Facundo Batista
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/2/26, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
They check out bsddb from subversion, see Tools/buildbot/external.
If you don't trust that they did so correctly, edit the script to
remove bsddb, check that in,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:04:47PM -0800, Brett Cannon wrote:
Or we can get rid of bsddb and not have the problem anymore. =)
+1 for smaller stdlib and fewer problems.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmannhttp://phd.pp.ru/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die,
On 2/26/08, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Facundo Batista
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/2/26, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
They check out bsddb from subversion, see Tools/buildbot/external.
If you don't trust that they did so
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/08, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Facundo Batista
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/2/26, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
They check out bsddb from
All fail in test_compiler.py.
--
.Facundo
Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Facundo Batista wrote:
All fail in test_compiler.py.
Thomas Herve has worked out a patch: http://bugs.python.org/issue2177
Christian
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
2008/2/25, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas Herve has worked out a patch: http://bugs.python.org/issue2177
After reviewing, testing and etc, I commited it. Let's see the buildbots! :)
--
.Facundo
Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
2008/2/25, Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/2/25, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas Herve has worked out a patch: http://bugs.python.org/issue2177
After reviewing, testing and etc, I commited it. Let's see the buildbots! :)
Some are green, now, but others still are in red,
Facundo Batista a écrit :
2008/2/25, Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/2/25, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas Herve has worked out a patch: http://bugs.python.org/issue2177
After reviewing, testing and etc, I commited it. Let's see the buildbots! :)
Some are
28 matches
Mail list logo
