On 03.11.10 19:21, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Hi,
Python code coverage doesn't include any .py files. What happened?
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
Did it work before?
It did, however currently the logfile
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/testlog.txt
shows the following exception:
Hi,
Python code coverage doesn't include any .py files. What happened?
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
Did it work before?
--
anatoly t.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
--
anatoly t.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
--
Senthil
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Senthil Kumaran orsenthil at gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
The fact that the log shows some test failures isn't very comforting.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
Thank you. What is the status of getting these stats on python.org?
Wouldn't status imply that there is a plan to do
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:36:14PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
Thank you. What is the status of getting
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:42, C. Titus Brown c...@msu.edu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:36:14PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
Hello all!
The code coverage site at http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ was broken for
the last few months. It's fixed again now and runs the test suite once
per day with
regrtest.py -T -N -uurlfetch,largefile,network,decimal
Servus,
Walter
___
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Walter Dörwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
The code coverage site at http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ was broken for
the last few months. It's fixed again now and runs the test suite once
per day with
regrtest.py -T -N
Titus Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:37:30AM -0400, Benji York wrote:
- Brett Cannon wrote:
- But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
- but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
- injection would be required to get the
Brett Cannon wrote:
But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were
based on platform-specific things.
I don't know if we need
Benji York wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote:
But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were
based on platform-specific things.
I
On 6/19/06, Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote: But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were
based on
Brett Cannon wrote:
Ah, do the union of the coverage! Yeah, that would be nice and give the
most accurate coverage data in terms of what is actually being tested.
But as Titus says in another email, question is how to get that data
sent back to be correlated against.
It might be
Folks,
I've just run a code coverage report for the python2.4 branch:
http://vallista.idyll.org/~t/temp/python2.4-svn/
This report uses my figleaf code,
http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/figleaf-latest.tar.gz
I'm interested in feedback on a few things --
* what more would
On 6/15/06, Titus Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,I've just run a code coverage report for the python2.4 branch:http://vallista.idyll.org/~t/temp/python2.4-svn/This report uses my figleaf code,
http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/figleaf-latest.tar.gzVery nice, Titus!
I'm interested in
Brett Cannon wrote:
But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were
based on platform-specific things.
There's something odd
18 matches
Mail list logo
