On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 15:10, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>> Am I correct in assuming that "stable" buildbots are required to be
>> reasonably functional before a release is tagged?
>
> Yep - all green is the goal.
Indeed, that's the main differenc
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 15:10, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:41, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:12, Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:41, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:12, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:25 AM, David Robinow wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:41, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:12, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:25 AM, David Robinow wrote:
>>>
Cygwin is not really a supported platform.
>>>
>>> ..
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:12, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:25 AM, David Robinow wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Cygwin is not really a supported platform.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> [Ultimately somebody with an
>>> interest in cygwin will
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:12, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:25 AM, David Robinow wrote:
>
>>
>> Cygwin is not really a supported platform.
>
> ...
>
>> [Ultimately somebody with an
>> interest in cygwin will need to get active in python development. I've
>> been meaning to d
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:25 AM, David Robinow wrote:
>
> Cygwin is not really a supported platform.
...
> [Ultimately somebody with an
> interest in cygwin will need to get active in python development. I've
> been meaning to do this but life gets in the way.]
>
I was bitten by the lack of Cy
