Re: [Python-Dev] Discussion on fspath: please wait for a PEP

2016-04-20 Thread Brett Cannon
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 at 10:51 Koos Zevenhoven wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Victor Stinner > wrote: > > > > 2016-04-20 18:12 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : > >> > >> I thought Chris and I w/ Ethan helping with coding, but if

Re: [Python-Dev] Discussion on fspath: please wait for a PEP

2016-04-20 Thread Koos Zevenhoven
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > > 2016-04-20 18:12 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : >> >> I thought Chris and I w/ Ethan helping with coding, but if it's just me for >> the PEP then that's fine; Well, just in case you didn't notice

Re: [Python-Dev] Discussion on fspath: please wait for a PEP

2016-04-20 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, 2016-04-20 18:12 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : >> >> Can you please wait for a PEP? Brett Canon and Ethan Furman are >> >> working on a PEP. > > I was actually going to send this email when I got in to work today, but > Victor and timezones beat me to it. :) Ha ha, bitten by the

Re: [Python-Dev] Discussion on fspath: please wait for a PEP

2016-04-20 Thread Brett Cannon
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 at 07:07 Chris Angelico wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Ethan Furman wrote: > > On 04/20/2016 04:52 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > > > >> Can you please wait for a PEP? Brett Canon and Ethan Furman are > >> working on a PEP. > I

Re: [Python-Dev] Discussion on fspath: please wait for a PEP

2016-04-20 Thread Ethan Furman
On 04/20/2016 04:52 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: FYI there is already an article about fspath/pathlib on LWN. Here is a free link until the article is freely accessible: "Python looks at paths" By Jake Edge (April 13, 2016) https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/683350/4f52334af09653c8/ Nice article,

Re: [Python-Dev] Discussion on fspath: please wait for a PEP

2016-04-20 Thread Koos Zevenhoven
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm unable to count the number of threads about the fspath protocol. > It's even more difficult to count the total number of emails. IMHO > everyone had enough time to give him/her opinion. Couldn't agree

Re: [Python-Dev] Discussion on fspath: please wait for a PEP

2016-04-20 Thread Chris Angelico
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Ethan Furman wrote: > On 04/20/2016 04:52 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > >> Can you please wait for a PEP? Brett Canon and Ethan Furman are >> working on a PEP. > > > Actually, Brett Canon and Chris Angelico. I thought just Brett; my half of the

Re: [Python-Dev] Discussion on fspath: please wait for a PEP

2016-04-20 Thread Ethan Furman
On 04/20/2016 04:52 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: Can you please wait for a PEP? Brett Canon and Ethan Furman are working on a PEP. Actually, Brett Canon and Chris Angelico. > So please give them time to write it. Okay, I'll shut-up now. ;) -- ~Ethan~

[Python-Dev] Discussion on fspath: please wait for a PEP

2016-04-20 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, I'm unable to count the number of threads about the fspath protocol. It's even more difficult to count the total number of emails. IMHO everyone had enough time to give him/her opinion. We even had multiple summaries :-) Can you please wait for a PEP? Brett Canon and Ethan Furman are working