Georg Brandl writes:
You speak my mind. For ages I've wanted to put the builtins together with
the language reference into a new document called Python Core Language.
I've just never had the time to draft a serious proposal.
I think that combination is reasonable, but I would like to see
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Georg Brandl writes:
You speak my mind. For ages I've wanted to put the builtins together with
the language reference into a new document called Python Core Language.
I've just never had the time to draft a
Adam Olsen wrote:
Such a division would make it unnecessarily hard to find documentation
on True, False, None, etc. They've become keywords for pragmatic
purposes (to prevent accidental modification), not because we think
they ideally should be syntax instead of builtins.
Maybe the solution
Greg Ewing wrote:
Adam Olsen wrote:
Such a division would make it unnecessarily hard to find documentation
on True, False, None, etc. They've become keywords for pragmatic
purposes (to prevent accidental modification), not because we think
they ideally should be syntax instead of builtins.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Ewing wrote:
Adam Olsen wrote:
Such a division would make it unnecessarily hard to find documentation
on True, False, None, etc. They've become keywords for pragmatic
purposes (to prevent accidental
