On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Armin Rigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Phillip,
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 07:05:12PM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > > I did not, however, need the equality of bound m
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Armin Rigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 07:05:12PM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > I did not, however, need the equality of bound methods to be based on
> > object value equality, just value identity.
> >
> > ...at lea
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 12:26 PM 3/10/2008 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
>> In general, "x.append" is interchangeable with "x.append" even if
>> "x.append is not x.append", so let's go for the least surprizing
>> behavior: "m1.im_self is m2.im_self and m1.im_func==m2.im_func".
>> Objection?
>
> Nope
At 12:26 PM 3/10/2008 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
>Hi Phillip,
>
>On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 07:05:12PM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > I did not, however, need the equality of bound methods to be based on
> > object value equality, just value identity.
> >
> > ...at least until recently, anyway. I do
Hi Phillip,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 07:05:12PM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> I did not, however, need the equality of bound methods to be based on
> object value equality, just value identity.
>
> ...at least until recently, anyway. I do have one library that wants
> to have equality-based co
At 01:59 PM 3/9/2008 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>Do we have much of a use case for this?
I've often had APIs that take a callback that promise to only invoke
the callback once, even if it's added more than once. And I've used
dicts, lists, and sets for same.
I did not, however, need the eq
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> That said, if there's a use case, I agree that it would be okay with
> basing the equality of x.foo and y.foo on whether x and y are the same
> object, not on whether x==y (consider 0 .__add__ == 0.0 .__add__).
The use case in the issue tracker was maintaining a collectio
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Armin Rigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In Python 2.5, I made an attempt to make equality consistent for the
> > various built-in and user-defined method types. I failed,
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Armin Rigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In Python 2.5, I made an attempt to make equality consistent for the
> various built-in and user-defined method types. I failed, though, as
> explained in http://bugs.python.org/issue1617161. The outcome of thi
Hi all,
In Python 2.5, I made an attempt to make equality consistent for the
various built-in and user-defined method types. I failed, though, as
explained in http://bugs.python.org/issue1617161. The outcome of this
discussion is that, first of all, we need to decide which behavior is
"correct":
10 matches
Mail list logo
