As long as it's been brought up here:
Yes, the PSF is applying. Google has been deliberately stirring
things up in the last couple of years, so no promises, but it is very
likely that we will be approved and core Python will have at least two
slots allocated (although I'm not sure core Python eve
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 at 02:14 Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the FAT Python project subject to the Google
> Summer of Code:
> https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/
>
> I have a long list of optimization ideas for fatoptimizer:
> http://fatoptimizer.readthedocs.or
Hi,
I would like to propose the FAT Python project subject to the Google
Summer of Code:
https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/
I have a long list of optimization ideas for fatoptimizer:
http://fatoptimizer.readthedocs.org/en/latest/todo.html
The fatoptimizer project is written in pure
Jython plans to participate in the Google Summer of Code for 2015. If you
are interested, I have outlined a number of projects on our ideas page that
students could work on:
- Work on JyNI, which adds C extension API support to Jython
- Performance optimizations, including startup time
-
For anyone who completely isn't familiar with this: Google Summer of
Code is a program where Google pays students to work on open source
projects for the summer. The motto goes: "Flip bits, not burgers."
Google Summer of Code applications are open for mentoring
organizations, and I've already
On 03/26/2013 01:51 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
Just an FYI that there are under 3 days to apply to Google Summer of
Code for mentoring organizations:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013. The
student application deadline is later on in May.
If you run a project that is intere
Just an FYI that there are under 3 days to apply to Google Summer of
Code for mentoring organizations:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013. The
student application deadline is later on in May.
If you run a project that is interested in applying under the Python
umbrella org
C. Titus Brown wrote:
> [...]
> I have had a hard time getting a good sense of what core code is well
> tested and what is not well tested, across various platforms. While
> Walter's C/Python integrated code coverage site is nice, it would be
> even nicer to have a way to generate all that inform
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 4:38 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> Unquestionably "core" by my criteria above:
>
> 3to2 tool -- 'nuff said.
I worked on the 3to2 tool during the sprint last week at PyCon. I can
chip in for GSoC in the event it does get picked up.
-Ron
PS - I'm out of town next week for
> The student will also provide some plugins for a maximum number of
> existing keyring systems.
> Some of these plugins might be included in Distutils, and some of them
> in a third-party package.
This is slightly better, but see my previous message (that is feature
creep in distutils, and likely
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> -> I'm also skeptical that this is a good SoC project in the first place.
>
> What is a good SoC project from your point of view ?
As a core project - tricky. Implement some long-standing complex feature
request, or fix a pile of outstanding bug reports for a module (like
th
> I'm using "core projects" as a shorthand for projects that directly
> address the core development environment, the stdlib, and priorities of
> committers on python-dev. Tarek is a committer, and it sounded like
> you, Jim, and Georg were all interested in this project, too -- that
> pushes it w
Ok what about this then: I am changing the scope a little bit, and I
think the students will be fine with this change
since it's the same work.
"The project will consist of creating a plugin system into Distutils
to be able to store and retrieve the username/password
used by some commands, without
> -> I'm also skeptical that this is a good SoC project in the first place.
What is a good SoC project from your point of view ?
> -> Coming up with a wrapper for, say, Apple Keychain, could be a good
> -> project. Coming up with a unifying API for all keychains is out of
> -> scope, IMO; various
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 08:13:35AM +0200, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
-> > 2x "keyring package" -- see
-> >
http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/pycon-hallway-session-1-a-keyring-library-for-python/.
-> > The poorer one of these will probably be axed unless Tarek gives it
-> > strong support.
-
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:21:18PM +0200, Mario wrote:
-> > He says vague things about patches too, but I'm not sure what. If he
-> > wanted to make that into a 'patchbot' that just applied every patch in
-> > isolation and ran 'make && make test' and posted results in the
-> > tracker I'd be a ha
>
>
> He says vague things about patches too, but I'm not sure what. If he
> wanted to make that into a 'patchbot' that just applied every patch in
> isolation and ran 'make && make test' and posted results in the
> tracker I'd be a happy camper.
>
>
Jack, how about you write that idea down on the
> 2x "keyring package" -- see
> http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/pycon-hallway-session-1-a-keyring-library-for-python/.
> The poorer one of these will probably be axed unless Tarek gives it
> strong support.
I don't think these are good "core" projects. Even if the students come
up with
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 4:38 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
[megasnip]
> roundup VCS integration / build tools to support core development --
> a single student proposed both of these and has received some
> support. See http://slexy.org/view/s2pFgWxufI for details.
>From the listed web
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 06:05:02PM -0500, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
-> 2009/4/10 C. Titus Brown :
-> > 2x "improve testing tools for py3k" -- variously focus on improving test
-> > ?? ?? ?? ??coverage and testing wrappers.
-> >
-> > ?? ?? ?? ??One proposes to provide a nice wrapper to make nose and
2009/4/10 C. Titus Brown :
> 2x "improve testing tools for py3k" -- variously focus on improving test
> coverage and testing wrappers.
>
> One proposes to provide a nice wrapper to make nose and py.test
> capable of running the regrtests, which (with no change to
> regrt
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:53:23PM -0300, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> -> >
> -> > IDLE/Tkinter patch integration & improvement -- deal with ~120 tracker
> -> > ? ? ? ?issues relating to IDLE and Tkinter.
> -> >
> ->
> -> Is it important, for the
Well, I think Numpy is of huge importance to a major Python user segment,
the scientific community. I don't know if that makes it 'core', but I
strongly agree that it's important.
Better testing is always useful, and more "core", but IMO less important.
-T
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:38 AM, C. Titu
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:53:23PM -0300, Guilherme Polo wrote:
-> >
-> > IDLE/Tkinter patch integration & improvement -- deal with ~120 tracker
-> > ? ? ? ?issues relating to IDLE and Tkinter.
-> >
->
-> Is it important, for the discussion, to mention that it also involves
-> testing this area (i
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:38 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this year we have 10-12 GSoC applications that I've put in the "relevant
> to core Python development" category. These projects, if mentors etc
> are found, are *guaranteed* a slot under the PSF GSoC umbrella. As
> backup GSoC
Hi all,
this year we have 10-12 GSoC applications that I've put in the "relevant
to core Python development" category. These projects, if mentors etc
are found, are *guaranteed* a slot under the PSF GSoC umbrella. As
backup GSoC admin and general busybody, I've taken on the work of
coordinating
2008/2/28, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The Google Summer of Code is on again and I've been asked to coordinate
> the PSF's involvement.
These are great news, specially the second one, :)
Regards,
--
.Facundo
Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
The Google Summer of Code is on again and I've been asked to coordinate
the PSF's involvement.
You can find out more about GSoC at http://code.google.com/soc/2008/
There is also a page on the Python wiki:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode
Although the PSF does act as an umbrella organizat
On 3/7/07, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would *strongly* encourage the submission of some Jython projects
> under the PSF umbrella.
Great! I'll do my best to get some submitted.
-Frank
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
htt
While I guess there's nothing to stop Jython applying in its own
right, it makes far more sense to be under the umbrella of PSF. PyPy
projects last year were under PSF, for example.
I would *strongly* encourage the submission of some Jython projects
under the PSF umbrella.
James
On 07/03/2
On 3/7/07, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Google's Summer of Code is on again!
>
> I'm in the process of submitting the application for PSF to again be
> a mentoring organization.
> Because I would like core Python projects to be well represented, I
> particularly encourage python-dever
Google's Summer of Code is on again!
I'm in the process of submitting the application for PSF to again be
a mentoring organization.
A mailing list has been set up for people who are interested in
mentoring for the PSF. If you aren't able or willing to mentor but
still want to participate in
Hi all,
Mateusz Rukowicz wrote:
> I wish to participate in Google Summer of Code as a python developer. I
> have few ideas, what would be improved and added to python. Since these
> changes and add-ons would be codded in C, and added to python-core
> and/or as modules,I am not sure, if you are wi
"Josiah Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Then again, you already have your own implementation of a tree module,
> and it seems as though you would like to be paid for this already-done
> work. I don't know how google feels about such things,
They are explic
"Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josiah Carlson wrote:
> > There exists various C and Python implementations of both AVL and
> > Red-Black trees. For users of Python who want to use AVL and/or
> > Red-Black trees, I would urge them to use the Python implementations.
> > In t
Hye-Shik Chang wrote:
> On 4/25/06, Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the answer, but after application of a patch on python-2.4.3
>> I could not compile it. A conclusion of a stage of compilation in the
>> attached file.
>>
>>
>
> Aah. The patch is for Pyth
Josiah Carlson wrote:
There exists various C and Python implementations of both AVL and
Red-Black trees. For users of Python who want to use AVL and/or
Red-Black trees, I would urge them to use the Python implementations.
In the case of *needing* the speed of a C extension, there already
exist
Josiah Carlson wrote:
There exists various C and Python implementations of both AVL and
Red-Black trees. For users of Python who want to use AVL and/or
Red-Black trees, I would urge them to use the Python implementations.
In the case of *needing* the speed of a C extension, there already
exist
On 4/25/06, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There exists various C and Python implementations of both AVL and
> Red-Black trees. For users of Python who want to use AVL and/or
> Red-Black trees, I would urge them to use the Python implementations.
> In the case of *needing* the speed
2006/4/22, Mateusz Rukowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am now quite sure, what I would like to do, and is possible by you to
> accept - code decimal in C, most important things about that would:
I'd be glad to mentor this.
Regards,
.Facundo
Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http
There exists various C and Python implementations of both AVL and
Red-Black trees. For users of Python who want to use AVL and/or
Red-Black trees, I would urge them to use the Python implementations.
In the case of *needing* the speed of a C extension, there already
exists a CPython extension mo
I would like to participate in Google Summer of Code. The idea consists in
creation of a specialized class for work with binary trees AVL and RB. The
part of ideas is taken from Parrot (Perl6) where for pair values the
specialized type is stipulated. As advantages it is possible to note:
* High s
I would like to participate in Google Summer of Code. The idea consists in
creation of a specialized class for work with binary trees AVL and RB. The
part of ideas is taken from Parrot (Perl6) where for pair values the
specialized type is stipulated. As advantages it is possible to note:
* High s
Alex Martelli wrote:
>I see "redo Decimal in C" (possibly with the addition of some fast
>elementary transcendentals) and "enhance operations on longs"
>(multiplication first and foremost, and base-conversions probably
>next, as you suggested -- possibly with the addition of some fast
>number-theo
Alex Martelli wrote:
> gmpy.c
> #include's gmp.h and uses (==expands) some of the C macros there
> defined -- doesn't that make gmpy.o a derived work of gmp.h?
Assuming that gmp.h is the header which defines the
public interface of the gmp library, any code which
uses it as a library will be inclu
On Apr 21, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Alex Martelli wrote:
> On 4/21/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>>> GMP is covered by LGPL, so must any such derivative work
>>
>> But the wrapper is just using GMP as a library, so
>> it shouldn't be infected with LGPLness, should it?
>
> If a lawye
On 4/21/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > GMP is covered by LGPL, so must any such derivative work
>
> But the wrapper is just using GMP as a library, so
> it shouldn't be infected with LGPLness, should it?
If a lawyer for the PSF can confidently assert that gmpy is not a
deriva
Alex Martelli wrote:
> GMP is covered by LGPL, so must any such derivative work
But the wrapper is just using GMP as a library, so
it shouldn't be infected with LGPLness, should it?
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.
"Tim Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Mateusz Rukowicz]
> >> And last thing - It would be nice to add some number-theory functions to
> >> math module (or new one), like prime-tests,
>
> If they think doing much more here is out of bounds for them, trying
> to sneak it into longobject.c is c
On 4/21/06, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OTOH, the decimal type
> has potentially unbounded precision already, and the math-module
> functions have no idea what to do about that. Perhaps some non-gonzo
> (straightforward even if far from optimal, and coded in Python)
> arbitrary-precisi
On 4/21/06, Mateusz Rukowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> So I think the most valuable of my ideas would be improving long int +
> coding decimal in C. Anyway, I think it would be possible to add other
> ideas later.
I see "redo Decimal in C" (possibly with the addition of some fast
element
[Mateusz Rukowicz]
>> I wish to participate in Google Summer of Code as a python developer. I
>> have few ideas, what would be improved and added to python. Since these
>> changes and add-ons would be codded in C, and added to python-core
>> and/or as modules,I am not sure, if you are willing to ag
Guido van Rossum wrote:
>(Aside: you probably mean physicist, someone who practices physics. A
>physician is a doctor; don't ask me why. :-)
>
>
>
;) I'll remember ;)
>>interpreted languages are particularly good for physics simulations, in
>>which small error would grow so much, that results a
Alex Martelli wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Aahz wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006, Mateusz Rukowicz wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Next thing I would add is multi precision floating point type to
>>> the core and fraction type, which in some cases highly improves
>>> operations, which would have to b
On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Aahz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006, Mateusz Rukowicz wrote:
>>
>> Next thing I would add is multi precision floating point type to
>> the core and fraction type, which in some cases highly improves
>> operations, which would have to be done using floating point instea
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006, Mateusz Rukowicz wrote:
>
> Next thing I would add is multi precision floating point type to
> the core and fraction type, which in some cases highly improves
> operations, which would have to be done using floating point instead.
> Of course, math module will need update to s
On 4/21/06, Mateusz Rukowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >On 4/21/06, Mateusz Rukowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Next thing I would add is multi precision floating point type to the
> >>core and fraction type, which in some cases highly improves operations,
> >>which
Guido van Rossum wrote:
>On 4/21/06, Mateusz Rukowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Next thing I would add is multi precision floating point type to the
>>core and fraction type, which in some cases highly improves operations,
>>which would have to be done using floating point instead.
>>Of c
On 4/21/06, Mateusz Rukowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wish to participate in Google Summer of Code as a python developer. I
> have few ideas, what would be improved and added to python. Since these
> changes and add-ons would be codded in C, and added to python-core
> and/or as modules,I am n
I wish to participate in Google Summer of Code as a python developer. I
have few ideas, what would be improved and added to python. Since these
changes and add-ons would be codded in C, and added to python-core
and/or as modules,I am not sure, if you are willing to agree with these
ideas.
First of
I've found thread on python-dev related to pdb's weaknesses:
http://www.mail-archive.com/python-dev@python.org/msg05115.html
The opinions are that pdb is 'one of the more unPythonic modules' and
must be 'seriously
fixed'.I have similar experience with pdb's internals but I want to
know others opin
61 matches
Mail list logo
